Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.gitkkep might not be a good name for other SCM users #191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2014

Conversation

ayumin
Copy link
Member

@ayumin ayumin commented Oct 4, 2014

No description provided.

@hsbt
Copy link
Member

hsbt commented Oct 5, 2014

What's "other SCM users"?

I agree with only removing to needless .gitkeep.

@ayumin
Copy link
Member Author

ayumin commented Oct 5, 2014

Hmm, it's good questions.
I heard that, in the ancient age, the human race had used an another SCM which is named sub-bar-john. Also, I heard that, very very few people still be using sub-bar-john today. Honestly, I can't believe that be true, such people might are bothered it.

Kidding. As you know, '.gitkeep' does not related with Git, so I'd like to change the name of keeping file. Actually the rails are using '.keep' for that.

@hsbt
Copy link
Member

hsbt commented Oct 5, 2014

Actually the rails are using '.keep' for that.

👍 I understand your opinion.

hsbt added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2014
.gitkkep might not be a good name for other SCM users
@hsbt hsbt merged commit f219e99 into fastladder:master Oct 5, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants