You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a recent email on the FDC3 mailing list, @kriswest wrote:
... I also want to add that there is clearly significant interest in the community in enabling FDC3 use on the web. There is a strong use case in that it would enable better onboarding journeys with less drop-off (where you use an app on the web with others before adopting a desktop container or similar).
and:
But there are also additional challenges such as how to make the API available reliably without importing a proprietary module from a particular vendor into every app, how to deal with more than one implementation of API/Desktop Agent in the browser at once, how to do this reliably and securely within the browser sandbox etc.. Work needs to be done in the Standard to solve these issues and to make web browser use possible in a future FDC3 Standard version - which I believe is possible (and likely to involve using a vendor-agnostic FDC3 NPM module to detect and connect to API implementation(s)). However, we're going to need to do that work to enable the aforementioned API implementations to be compliant and if we fail to hold the line now on compliance with the current version of the FDC3 Standard, that may never happen.
FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.
FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.
A Discussion Group has no direct decision-making power regarding the FDC3 standard - rather it is intended that anything they propose or work on will result in proposals (via Github issues and PRs) for the Standards Working Group participants to consider and vote on for inclusion in the standard.
Participation Requirements
Note: Meeting participants are expected to accept the terms of the FDC3 license (Community Specification License), understand the governance process and have a CLA in place.
Please click the following links at the start of the meeting if you have not done so previously.
Note: Meeting participants are expected to add a comment to this GitHub issue in order that we can track attendance of FDC3 project meetings. Please do this at the start of the meeting.
Agenda
Convene & roll call, review meeting notices (5mins)
The meeting focused on review of the progress on the POC and on the draft documentation PR.
@kriswest gave an introduction to the Agent agnostic fdc3 spec #1167, which attempts to translate the proposal in the group's shared doc into a documentation PR and represents a large contribution of effort from @thorsent, which is much appreciated.
The draft includes messages needed in the wire protocol (currently called the Browser Communication Protocol) in Typescript format. It also introduces a specifications folder to separate out the (growing) info needed to implement a DA from the info needed to work with one - this seems a good idea as we always aim to keep complexity lower for app developers to aid uptake! The new files need adding to the docusaurus navigation.
@kriswest to migrate the PR branch to the FINOS repo to facilitate work on it by the maintainers to deal with comments submitted.
The main outstanding issues to POC are:
intent resolver and channel selector UI solutions - which are complicated by the need to use OS/vendor agnostic code only in the applications to preserve WORA.
@thorsent's documentation draft recommended that default implementations are provided by the FDC3 library initially - with the author suggesting that a later iteration could further refine this area, once the main thrust of the proposal is accepted. However, the meeting did not wholly agree, with a number of participants believing that we should find solutions that allow a DA to override the default implementations.
alignment with the proposal (changes may be needed in both directions)
Bridging does not provide all the required messages (but does have many of them, although some will be slightly off due to differing requirements in bridging).
@kriswest to make a start on dedicated messages - but ensure type names and payloads are shared with bridging wherever possible to keep maintenance costs low
@robmoffat indicated a desire to keep messages as similar as possible to bridging to make passing them between the different interfaces (to the web and to the bridge) in an implementation as simple as possible.
@robmoffat also indicated a desire to be able to use the wire protocol being worked out in other language implementation - supporting the need to have messages in JSON Schema format (rather than typescript) so that code for them can be generated for other languages via quicktype.
Action Items
@kriswest to migrate the PR branch to the FINOS repo to facilitate work on it by the maintainers to deal with comments submitted.
@kriswest to make a start on dedicated messages - but ensure type names and payloads are shared with bridging wherever possible to keep maintenance costs low
@robmoffat to continue exploring the POC - particularly regarding Intent resolvers and channel selector UIs
Untracked attendees
Full name
Affiliation
GitHub username
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Group overview
Group convened to discuss how to enable FDC3 use in a web browser, without the use of a browser extension (such as fdc3-desktop-agent or a container).
Issue: #896
Mailing list discussion: https://groups.google.com/a/finos.org/g/fdc3/c/jCvlLjokBLs
In a recent email on the FDC3 mailing list, @kriswest wrote:
... I also want to add that there is clearly significant interest in the community in enabling FDC3 use on the web. There is a strong use case in that it would enable better onboarding journeys with less drop-off (where you use an app on the web with others before adopting a desktop container or similar).
and:
But there are also additional challenges such as how to make the API available reliably without importing a proprietary module from a particular vendor into every app, how to deal with more than one implementation of API/Desktop Agent in the browser at once, how to do this reliably and securely within the browser sandbox etc.. Work needs to be done in the Standard to solve these issues and to make web browser use possible in a future FDC3 Standard version - which I believe is possible (and likely to involve using a vendor-agnostic FDC3 NPM module to detect and connect to API implementation(s)). However, we're going to need to do that work to enable the aforementioned API implementations to be compliant and if we fail to hold the line now on compliance with the current version of the FDC3 Standard, that may never happen.
Shared doc with current draft: https://tick42-my.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/finsemble_datastore_interop_io/EZ0dfTCdRlJCnIF3C_1Oit0B7xK0OOJ0nAvC73dwad53AA?e=x2zlge
Relevant issue tags
Current open issues that relate to the above concepts with the label:
Meeting Date
Thursday 21 March 2024 - 11am (US eastern timezone EDT) / 3pm (London, GMT)
Note the meeting start time in the US has shifted due to daylight savings time
Zoom info
Meeting notices
FINOS Project leads are responsible for observing the FINOS guidelines for running project meetings. Project maintainers can find additional resources in the FINOS Maintainers Cheatsheet.
All participants in FINOS project meetings are subject to the LF Antitrust Policy, the FINOS Community Code of Conduct and all other FINOS policies.
FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.
FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.
A Discussion Group has no direct decision-making power regarding the FDC3 standard - rather it is intended that anything they propose or work on will result in proposals (via Github issues and PRs) for the Standards Working Group participants to consider and vote on for inclusion in the standard.
Participation Requirements
Note: Meeting participants are expected to accept the terms of the FDC3 license (Community Specification License), understand the governance process and have a CLA in place.
Please click the following links at the start of the meeting if you have not done so previously.
Tracking Attendance
Note: Meeting participants are expected to add a comment to this GitHub issue in order that we can track attendance of FDC3 project meetings. Please do this at the start of the meeting.
Agenda
Minutes
Action Items
Untracked attendees
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: