switch to data-valid-required and data-valid-pattern=""

[jgallen23]

might be nicer to namespace the data attributes to avoid collision.

[ghost]

What dies value do? Is it a replacement for something or additional attribute.

[jgallen23]

data-valid="pattern" data-valid-value="\d" instead of data-pattern="\d"

[ghost]

So data-valid="required"?

[jgallen23]

yes, thoughts?

[ghost]

How do you handle something that is valid and pattern?

[jgallen23]

See above

[ghost]

Not following. Data-valid=required data-valid=pattern data-valid-value=\d?

[jgallen23]

well, as of right now, pattern implies required since \d will not pass if it's blank

[jgallen23]

if we want to change that, we could to data-valid="required,pattern" or do data-valid-required or data-valid-pattern

[ghost]

Will that work in all fields or just input?

[jgallen23]

what other fields does pattern work on?

[ghost]

I guess what im getting at is that required could be placed on a check box and then the regex won't work. And just because something has a regex doesn't mean it's required.

[jgallen23]

I'm not following. regex obviously won't work on a check box.

[ghost]

Did you intend for this library to be used on anything other than input boxes?

[jgallen23]

yep, should work with all form elements. Do you see an issue with that?

[jgallen23]

going to just namespace. data-valid-required, data-valid-pattern="\d"