Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom Classifier Sliders (ordering problem when adding more classes) #64

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Oct 13, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
When I open the Custom Classifier via GeoMap, the classification sliders
are spaced according to the number of classifications I have.  When I add
more classes (say, from 3 to 7), the new sliders are all placed on top of
one another on the right-most slider.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The enhancement I would recommend would be to space the new sliders out
evenly when you increase the number of classes.  As it stands, you have to
"unstack" them from a right-hand pile, then ensure in unstacking them that
you maintained the correct order.  Otherwise, you can accidentally put
divider 4 to the right of divider 5, giving you a 0 value for that class
until you put it in the right order again.  The first problem is that it's
not clear that all the additional dividers are stacked in one place.  The
second problem is that when you unstack them, you can mess up the order. 
The solutions to the second problem I see are:

1) Place a number above or inside each slider so you know the order they
are supposed to be in.
2) Don't allow the user to move the slider for a lower class to be higher
than the next class' slider. (for example, the slider for the 3rd class
from the left can't go to the right of the slider for the 4th class.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Using the newest (?) version with the 2008 election data.  It says 0.8.5,
but I think it might be newer...

Please provide any additional information below.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by psu.cr...@gmail.com on 17 Nov 2008 at 10:03

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by psu.cr...@gmail.com on 17 Nov 2008 at 10:04

  • Added labels: Priority-Low

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant