Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update covariant_templates_test after changes to TypeError. #51330

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2020

Conversation

sjindel-google
Copy link
Contributor

TypeError no longer implements AssertionError after dart-lang/sdk#40317.

TypeError no longer implements AssertionError after dart-lang/sdk#40317.
@fluttergithubbot fluttergithubbot added the framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels. label Feb 24, 2020
dart-bot pushed a commit to dart-lang/sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
The corresponding Flutter change is made in flutter/flutter#51330.

Change-Id: Ib3f233cd4153c04b22ba10e30eb532186fc9fb97
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/136961
Reviewed-by: Clement Skau <cskau@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Samir Jindel <sjindel@google.com>
@mkustermann
Copy link
Member

You can relax this condition, i.e. make current TOT pass and when engine rolls. Once the auto rollers have rolled everything we can make the check stricter again with new semantics.

@sjindel-google
Copy link
Contributor Author

The builders seem to be backed up, and I've run this through the autoroller locally, so I'm landing it preemptively to get the roll going again.

@sjindel-google sjindel-google merged commit 6f9ed76 into master Feb 24, 2020
@tvolkert tvolkert deleted the sjindel.type branch March 29, 2020 21:08
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 1, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants