Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2023. It is now read-only.

upgrading dockefile to go 1.19 #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

hamersaw
Copy link
Contributor

TL;DR

Upgrading dockerfile to use go 1.19 for uniformity in local builds.

Type

  • Bug Fix
  • Feature
  • Plugin

Are all requirements met?

  • Code completed
  • Smoke tested
  • Unit tests added
  • Code documentation added
  • Any pending items have an associated Issue

Complete description

^^^

Tracking Issue

NA

Follow-up issue

NA

Signed-off-by: Daniel Rammer <hamersaw@protonmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #60 (167028f) into master (a913fde) will increase coverage by 0.91%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 167028f differs from pull request most recent head a9d535d. Consider uploading reports for the commit a9d535d to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #60      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   16.87%   17.79%   +0.91%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         474      399      -75     
==========================================
- Hits           80       71       -9     
+ Misses        381      315      -66     
  Partials       13       13              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@hamersaw hamersaw merged commit e93f5bd into master Jun 28, 2023
12 checks passed
@hamersaw hamersaw deleted the housekeeping/upgrade-go-dockerfile branch June 28, 2023 15:00
eapolinario pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
Signed-off-by: Daniel Rammer <hamersaw@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants