Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

add a method to IPAddr instead of breaking a useful one #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 6, 2015

Conversation

jrafanie
Copy link
Contributor

@jrafanie jrafanie commented Apr 6, 2015

When ecloud was extracted, it didn't bring over this patch from base fog:
fog/fog@7a2719f

fog/fog#907

@jnewland wrote:
The monkey patch to IPAddr#mask in the ecloud compute provider unnecessarily removes functionality from IPAddr in both 1.8.7 and 1.9. This pull request adds a method to IPAddr instead of breaking a useful one.

When ecloud was extracted, it didn't bring over this patch from base fog:
fog/fog@7a2719f

fog/fog#907
> @jnewland wrote:
> The monkey patch to IPAddr#mask in the ecloud compute provider unnecessarily removes functionality from IPAddr in both 1.8.7 and 1.9. This pull request adds a method to IPAddr instead of breaking a useful one.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 66.01% when pulling 4b6900c on jrafanie:fix_monkey_patch into 1d3b4cc on fog:master.

plribeiro3000 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2015
add a method to IPAddr instead of breaking a useful one
@plribeiro3000 plribeiro3000 merged commit a2e7498 into fog:master Apr 6, 2015
@plribeiro3000
Copy link
Member

@jrafanie Thanks!

@jrafanie
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrafanie commented Apr 6, 2015

@plribeiro3000 Thanks! Can you release a new version? Just adding require 'fog' to any of our non-fog based tests that were using IPAddr#mask were failing with 1 for 0 errors... Thanks again!

@jrafanie
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrafanie commented Apr 6, 2015

Wow, you did already! Thanks @plribeiro3000 👍

@jrafanie jrafanie deleted the fix_monkey_patch branch April 6, 2015 19:34
@plribeiro3000
Copy link
Member

Done. Released as 0.1.1. =)

I was on it when you asked. :p

EDIT: Thanks you for the patch!

@jrafanie
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrafanie commented Apr 6, 2015

@plribeiro3000 I was pairing with @Fryguy on this and he spotted the problem when we were looking at the 0.0.2 -> 0.1.0 diff. Thanks for the fast turnaround!

@kbrock
Copy link

kbrock commented Apr 7, 2015

thanks for the great turn around all

@plribeiro3000
Copy link
Member

👍

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants