You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would you consider adding the option to keep some objects as they are? Because when having a complex nested array of data where everything except some certain type of data needs to be arraized this would be really handy.
My first idea would be to just use the existing transformer parameter. If the value is false just skip the arraization and keep the object:
Would you consider adding the option to keep some objects as they are? Because when having a complex nested array of data where everything except some certain type of data needs to be arraized this would be really handy.
My first idea would be to just use the existing transformer parameter. If the value is
false
just skip the arraization and keep the object:I wouldn't be surprised though if you said
wontfix
as this breaks the basic assumption thatJust asking... 😉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: