Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: type of transaction validation for the stock entry (backport #40986) (backport #40992) #40994

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Apr 13, 2024

Type of transaction should be outward for the stock entry having source warehouse


This is an automatic backport of pull request #40986 done by Mergify.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #40992 done by Mergify.

) (#40992)

* fix: type of transaction validation for the stock entry

(cherry picked from commit 8ad0295)

* chore: fix test case

---------

Co-authored-by: Rohit Waghchaure <rohitw1991@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4342b89)
@rohitwaghchaure rohitwaghchaure merged commit e07557c into version-15 Apr 13, 2024
12 checks passed
@rohitwaghchaure rohitwaghchaure deleted the mergify/bp/version-15/pr-40992 branch April 13, 2024 10:27
frappe-pr-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2024
## [15.20.3](v15.20.2...v15.20.3) (2024-04-13)

### Bug Fixes

* do not validate batch qty for LCV (backport [#40975](#40975)) (backport [#40981](#40981)) ([#40991](#40991)) ([7d12674](7d12674))
* type of transaction validation for the stock entry (backport [#40986](#40986)) (backport [#40992](#40992)) ([#40994](#40994)) ([e07557c](e07557c))
@frappe-pr-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 15.20.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants