[Issue] review function naming

[m50S79sM6SRNp8Jn]

It's important to use consistent and accurate naming conventions in programming to make code more understandable and maintainable.

on_date_change is really on_date_changed
on_progress_change is really on_progress_changed
on_view_change is really on_view_changed
<other?>

Actually, I prefer to have both the on...change and the on...changed functions (not a simple renaming).

Anyhow, you will have a breaking change.

[safwansamsudeen]

While I agree with the proposed change, I don't think it makes sense to have a breaking change now...

...unless we're anyway planning to release a major version soon. What do you think @netchampfaris?

[netchampfaris]

@m50S79sM6SRNp8Jn @safwansamsudeen

I don't think there's any problem with the event naming. Even HTML events are named like this.
For e.g., when you interact with an input, it fires the change event and not changed.

Ref: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLElement/change_event