-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document backup/restore procedures #46
Comments
As a first step, @rocodes has offered to spend about a day on exploring the current options. We're interesting in questions like:
This will guide our documentation efforts. |
@rocodes Can you post a summary of your findings so far to this issue? |
Cross-referencing progress update here: freedomofpress/securedrop-workstation#120 (comment) |
Circling back to this:
Scope of backup questions
|
For the coming sprint, I can work on the 'first pass' part of this (basic workflow + documentation) but I think we should answer the scope questions, especially around things like what parts of dom0 we back up. As an aside, when trying to think about this: the restore workflow currently requires users to run |
Thanks @rocodes. A first pass workflow that includes manual steps sounds like a great first step to me. I think there are two Qs likely to come up from newsrooms:
The first of these seems to me the most important to speak to clearly in the docs soon. Given that the server holds the same submission contents as the workstation, that's mainly the secrets that live in |
I'm adding a note (to myself?) to investigate https://github.com/tasket/wyng-backup for faster/incremental backup support in Qubes. |
Clear backup/restore procedures are going to be a must-have requirement for wider production usage of SecureDrop Workstation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: