You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just noticed that the genetic map has a numeric chromosome notation (1,2,3..X), while the reference panel files include the "chr" prefix. Does this have any effect?
Also, I have compared the genetic files provided by shapeit5_resources and the one provided by mocha, and there seem to be some differences, e.g:
At the moment, and for legacy reasons, I still advise to use the genetic map from Eagle2, which might be a little difference from the one used by SHAPEIT4 and SHAPEIT5. There is no good reason for this and you should feel free to use what you prefer. As long as you format it correctly, you can use the genetic map of your choice. I did not provide any input in the generation of the genetic maps
Hi!
I just noticed that the genetic map has a numeric chromosome notation (1,2,3..X), while the reference panel files include the "chr" prefix. Does this have any effect?
Also, I have compared the genetic files provided by shapeit5_resources and the one provided by
mocha
, and there seem to be some differences, e.g:Any guess of why this might be the case?
One last question, do
shapeit5
andimpute5
use the same genetic map?Thank you in advance,
Irantzu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: