You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Some (most/all) individual scores are listes twice in the detailed list. Sometimes even with different scores
In the example: RCVD_IN_PBL is listed with 3.3as well as 0 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 is listed with 1.6as well as 0 BAYES_00 is listed with -1.9as well as 0
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE is listed with and without description
Expected behavior
Each score should only be listed once, with the right score
Screenshots
Thunderbird (please complete the following information):
OS: macOS Mojave (10.14.6) & Big Sur (11.6.1)
Version: 91.9.0
Spam Score add-on (please complete the following information):
Version: 1.4.0
Additional context
Source:
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BITCOIN_ONAN,
BITCOIN_SPAM_02,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,PDS_BTC_ID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_XBL,
RDNS_NONE,SPF_FAIL,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
* blocked. See
* http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
* for more information.
* [URIs: olefa.com]
* 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
* [186.82.84.17 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
* 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
* -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
* 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
* https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
* [186.82.84.17 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
* -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
* high trust
* [186.82.84.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
* 1.6 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
* 0.0 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
* [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=info%40olefa.com;ip=186.82.84.17;r=s1.educdesign.lu]
* 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
* address
* [186.82.84.17 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
* 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
* -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available.
* 0.0 PDS_BTC_ID FP reduced Bitcoin ID
* 0.2 BITCOIN_SPAM_02 BitCoin spam pattern 02
* 1.0 BITCOIN_ONAN BitCoin + [censored]
Headers as they are displayed by Thunderbird:
Might be regex having problems with something in the description, e.g. + in BITCOIN_ONAN?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for reporting! It looks like the X-Spam-Status and the X-Spam-Report header are both being parsed. The X-Spam-Status header however has no detailed information so additional zero scores are added to the list. I will check the priority of the headers and report back when the issue is fixed...
Maybe it is time to implement a custom priority that can be adjusted in the add-on settings as mentioned in #7.
You might be right.
Until a week ago I only hat the X-Spam-Status, which was propperly parsed, but hat 0 for each score in the popup. The duplicates (with the right scores on half of them) only showed up after I enabled the X-Spam-Report too.
I could propably fix it this by removing the tests form the X-Spam-Status …
Describe the bug
Some (most/all) individual scores are listes twice in the detailed list. Sometimes even with different scores
In the example:
RCVD_IN_PBL
is listed with3.3
as well as0
DATE_IN_PAST_03_06
is listed with1.6
as well as0
BAYES_00
is listed with-1.9
as well as0
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
is listed with and without descriptionExpected behavior
Each score should only be listed once, with the right score
Screenshots
Thunderbird (please complete the following information):
Spam Score add-on (please complete the following information):
Additional context
Source:
Headers as they are displayed by Thunderbird:
Might be regex having problems with something in the description, e.g.
+
inBITCOIN_ONAN
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: