dts: nanopi m2: add nanopi m2 dts #4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: perfectnewer <weixipeng@outlook.com>
friendlyarm
force-pushed
the
nanopi2-v4.4.y
branch
2 times, most recently
from
edef35a
to
629cdf4
Compare
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit e40b801 ] There is a certain chance to trigger the following panic: PID: 5900 TASK: ffff88c1c8af4100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "kworker/1:48" #0 [ffff9456c1cc79a0] machine_kexec at ffffffff870665b7 friendlyarm#1 [ffff9456c1cc79f0] __crash_kexec at ffffffff871b4c7a friendlyarm#2 [ffff9456c1cc7ab0] crash_kexec at ffffffff871b5b60 friendlyarm#3 [ffff9456c1cc7ac0] oops_end at ffffffff87026ce7 friendlyarm#4 [ffff9456c1cc7ae0] page_fault_oops at ffffffff87075715 friendlyarm#5 [ffff9456c1cc7b58] exc_page_fault at ffffffff87ad0654 friendlyarm#6 [ffff9456c1cc7b80] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff87c00b62 [exception RIP: ib_alloc_mr+19] RIP: ffffffffc0c9cce3 RSP: ffff9456c1cc7c38 RFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff88c1ea281d00 R8: 000000020a34ffff R9: ffff88c1350bbb20 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000010 R14: ffff88c1ab040a50 R15: ffff88c1ea281d00 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 friendlyarm#7 [ffff9456c1cc7c60] smc_ib_get_memory_region at ffffffffc0aff6df [smc] friendlyarm#8 [ffff9456c1cc7c88] smcr_buf_map_link at ffffffffc0b0278c [smc] friendlyarm#9 [ffff9456c1cc7ce0] __smc_buf_create at ffffffffc0b03586 [smc] The reason here is that when the server tries to create a second link, smc_llc_srv_add_link() has no protection and may add a new link to link group. This breaks the security environment protected by llc_conf_mutex. Fixes: 2d2209f ("net/smc: first part of add link processing as SMC server") Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit 3a70e0d ] When doing timestamping in lan966x and having PROVE_LOCKING enabled the following warning is shown. ======================================================== WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected 6.2.0-rc7-01749-gc54e1f7f7e36 #2786 Tainted: G N -------------------------------------------------------- swapper/0/0 just changed the state of lock: c2609f50 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: (&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); lock(&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock); <Interrupt> lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: c1001e18 ((&ndev->rs_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x0/0x33c friendlyarm#1: c105e7c4 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ndisc_send_skb+0x134/0x81c friendlyarm#2: c105e7d8 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip6_finish_output2+0x17c/0xc64 friendlyarm#3: c105e7d8 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x4c/0x1224 friendlyarm#4: c3056174 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x354/0x1224 the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: -> (&lan966x->ptp_ts_id_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 lan966x_ptp_irq_handler+0x164/0x2a8 irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread+0x130/0x278 kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 lan966x_ptp_irq_handler+0x164/0x2a8 irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread+0x130/0x278 kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x68 lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request+0x128/0x1cc lan966x_port_xmit+0x224/0x43c dev_hard_start_xmit+0xa8/0x2f0 sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 packet_sendmsg+0xdb4/0x134c __sys_sendto+0xd0/0x154 sys_send+0x18/0x20 ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c } ... key at: [<c174ba0c>] __key.2+0x0/0x8 ... acquired at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x68 lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request+0x128/0x1cc lan966x_port_xmit+0x224/0x43c dev_hard_start_xmit+0xa8/0x2f0 sch_direct_xmit+0x108/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 packet_sendmsg+0xdb4/0x134c __sys_sendto+0xd0/0x154 sys_send+0x18/0x20 ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c -> (_xmit_ETHER#2){+.-.}-{2:2} { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 netif_freeze_queues+0x38/0x68 dev_deactivate_many+0xac/0x388 dev_deactivate+0x38/0x6c linkwatch_do_dev+0x70/0x8c __linkwatch_run_queue+0xd4/0x1e8 linkwatch_event+0x24/0x34 process_one_work+0x284/0x744 worker_thread+0x28/0x4bc kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 ip6_finish_output2+0x5f4/0xc64 ndisc_send_skb+0x4cc/0x81c addrconf_rs_timer+0xb0/0x2f8 call_timer_fn+0xb4/0x33c expire_timers+0xb4/0x10c run_timer_softirq+0xf8/0x2a8 __do_softirq+0xd4/0x5fc __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x17c irq_exit+0x8/0x28 __irq_svc+0x90/0xbc arch_cpu_idle+0x30/0x3c default_idle_call+0x44/0xac do_idle+0xc8/0x138 cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c rest_init+0xcc/0x168 arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 netif_freeze_queues+0x38/0x68 dev_deactivate_many+0xac/0x388 dev_deactivate+0x38/0x6c linkwatch_do_dev+0x70/0x8c __linkwatch_run_queue+0xd4/0x1e8 linkwatch_event+0x24/0x34 process_one_work+0x284/0x744 worker_thread+0x28/0x4bc kthread+0xec/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 } ... key at: [<c175974c>] netdev_xmit_lock_key+0x8/0x1c8 ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x978/0x2978 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 ip6_finish_output2+0x5f4/0xc64 ndisc_send_skb+0x4cc/0x81c addrconf_rs_timer+0xb0/0x2f8 call_timer_fn+0xb4/0x33c expire_timers+0xb4/0x10c run_timer_softirq+0xf8/0x2a8 __do_softirq+0xd4/0x5fc __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x17c irq_exit+0x8/0x28 __irq_svc+0x90/0xbc arch_cpu_idle+0x30/0x3c default_idle_call+0x44/0xac do_idle+0xc8/0x138 cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c rest_init+0xcc/0x168 arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G N 6.2.0-rc7-01749-gc54e1f7f7e36 #2786 Hardware name: Generic DT based system unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from mark_lock.part.0+0x59c/0x93c mark_lock.part.0 from __lock_acquire+0x978/0x2978 __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0xb0/0x248 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x48 _raw_spin_lock from sch_direct_xmit+0x16c/0x2e8 sch_direct_xmit from __dev_queue_xmit+0x41c/0x1224 __dev_queue_xmit from ip6_finish_output2+0x5f4/0xc64 ip6_finish_output2 from ndisc_send_skb+0x4cc/0x81c ndisc_send_skb from addrconf_rs_timer+0xb0/0x2f8 addrconf_rs_timer from call_timer_fn+0xb4/0x33c call_timer_fn from expire_timers+0xb4/0x10c expire_timers from run_timer_softirq+0xf8/0x2a8 run_timer_softirq from __do_softirq+0xd4/0x5fc __do_softirq from __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x17c __irq_exit_rcu from irq_exit+0x8/0x28 irq_exit from __irq_svc+0x90/0xbc Exception stack(0xc1001f20 to 0xc1001f68) 1f20: ffffffff ffffffff 00000001 c011f840 c100e000 c100e000 c1009314 c1009370 1f40: c10f0c1a c0d5e564 c0f5da8c 00000000 00000000 c1001f70 c010f0bc c010f0c0 1f60: 600f0013 ffffffff __irq_svc from arch_cpu_idle+0x30/0x3c arch_cpu_idle from default_idle_call+0x44/0xac default_idle_call from do_idle+0xc8/0x138 do_idle from cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x1c cpu_startup_entry from rest_init+0xcc/0x168 rest_init from arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8 Fix this by using spin_lock_irqsave/spin_lock_irqrestore also inside lan966x_ptp_irq_handler. Fixes: e85a96e ("net: lan966x: Add support for ptp interrupts") Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230217210917.2649365-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit 91621be ] When --overwrite and --max-size options of perf record are used together, a segmentation fault occurs. The following is an example: # perf record -e sched:sched* --overwrite --max-size 1K -a -- sleep 1 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] perf: Segmentation fault Obtained 12 stack frames. ./perf/perf(+0x197673) [0x55f99710b673] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3ef0f) [0x7fa45f3cff0f] ./perf/perf(+0x8eb40) [0x55f997002b40] ./perf/perf(+0x1f6882) [0x55f99716a882] ./perf/perf(+0x794c2) [0x55f996fed4c2] ./perf/perf(+0x7b7c7) [0x55f996fef7c7] ./perf/perf(+0x9074b) [0x55f99700474b] ./perf/perf(+0x12e23c) [0x55f9970a223c] ./perf/perf(+0x12e54a) [0x55f9970a254a] ./perf/perf(+0x7db60) [0x55f996ff1b60] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x7fa45f3b2c86] ./perf/perf(+0x7dfe9) [0x55f996ff1fe9] Segmentation fault (core dumped) backtrace of the core file is as follows: (gdb) bt #0 record__bytes_written (rec=0x55f99755a200 <record>) at builtin-record.c:234 friendlyarm#1 record__output_max_size_exceeded (rec=0x55f99755a200 <record>) at builtin-record.c:242 friendlyarm#2 record__write (map=0x0, size=12816, bf=0x55f9978da2e0, rec=0x55f99755a200 <record>) at builtin-record.c:263 friendlyarm#3 process_synthesized_event (tool=tool@entry=0x55f99755a200 <record>, event=event@entry=0x55f9978da2e0, sample=sample@entry=0x0, machine=machine@entry=0x55f997893658) at builtin-record.c:618 friendlyarm#4 0x000055f99716a883 in __perf_event__synthesize_id_index (tool=tool@entry=0x55f99755a200 <record>, process=process@entry=0x55f997002aa0 <process_synthesized_event>, evlist=0x55f9978928b0, machine=machine@entry=0x55f997893658, from=from@entry=0) at util/synthetic-events.c:1895 friendlyarm#5 0x000055f99716a91f in perf_event__synthesize_id_index (tool=tool@entry=0x55f99755a200 <record>, process=process@entry=0x55f997002aa0 <process_synthesized_event>, evlist=<optimized out>, machine=machine@entry=0x55f997893658) at util/synthetic-events.c:1905 friendlyarm#6 0x000055f996fed4c3 in record__synthesize (tail=tail@entry=true, rec=0x55f99755a200 <record>) at builtin-record.c:1997 friendlyarm#7 0x000055f996fef7c8 in __cmd_record (argc=argc@entry=2, argv=argv@entry=0x7ffc67551260, rec=0x55f99755a200 <record>) at builtin-record.c:2802 friendlyarm#8 0x000055f99700474c in cmd_record (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7ffc67551260) at builtin-record.c:4258 friendlyarm#9 0x000055f9970a223d in run_builtin (p=0x55f997564d88 <commands+264>, argc=10, argv=0x7ffc67551260) at perf.c:330 torvalds#10 0x000055f9970a254b in handle_internal_command (argc=10, argv=0x7ffc67551260) at perf.c:384 torvalds#11 0x000055f996ff1b61 in run_argv (argcp=<synthetic pointer>, argv=<synthetic pointer>) at perf.c:428 torvalds#12 main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7ffc67551260) at perf.c:562 The reason is that record__bytes_written accesses the freed memory rec->thread_data, The process is as follows: __cmd_record -> record__free_thread_data -> zfree(&rec->thread_data) // free rec->thread_data -> record__synthesize -> perf_event__synthesize_id_index -> process_synthesized_event -> record__write -> record__bytes_written // access rec->thread_data We add a member variable "thread_bytes_written" in the struct "record" to save the data size written by the threads. Fixes: 6d57581 ("perf record: Add support for limit perf output file size") Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Jiwei Sun <jiwei.sun@windriver.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAM9d7ci_TRrqBQVQNW8=GwakUr7SsZpYxaaty-S4bxF8zJWyqw@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit a9cbc1b ] linux-next commit ("cpuidle: tracing: Warn about !rcu_is_watching()") adds a new warning which hits on s390's arch_cpu_idle() function: RCU not on for: arch_cpu_idle+0x0/0x28 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at include/linux/trace_recursion.h:162 arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x24c/0x258 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc6-next-20230202 friendlyarm#4 Hardware name: IBM 8561 T01 703 (z/VM 7.3.0) Krnl PSW : 0404d00180000000 00000000002b55c0 (arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x250/0x258) R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:1 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Krnl GPRS: c0000000ffffbfff 0000000080000002 0000000000000026 0000000000000000 0000037ffffe3a28 0000037ffffe3a20 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000f4acf6 00000000001044f0 0000037ffffe3cb0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000002b55bc 0000037ffffe3bb8 Krnl Code: 00000000002b55b0: c02000840051 larl %r2,0000000001335652 00000000002b55b6: c0e5fff512d1 brasl %r14,0000000000157b58 #00000000002b55bc: af000000 mc 0,0 >00000000002b55c0: a7f4ffe7 brc 15,00000000002b558e 00000000002b55c4: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 00000000002b55c6: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 00000000002b55c8: eb6ff0480024 stmg %r6,%r15,72(%r15) 00000000002b55ce: b90400ef lgr %r14,%r15 Call Trace: [<00000000002b55c0>] arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x250/0x258 ([<00000000002b55bc>] arch_ftrace_ops_list_func+0x24c/0x258) [<0000000000f5f0fc>] ftrace_common+0x1c/0x20 [<00000000001044f6>] arch_cpu_idle+0x6/0x28 [<0000000000f4acf6>] default_idle_call+0x76/0x128 [<00000000001cc374>] do_idle+0xf4/0x1b0 [<00000000001cc6ce>] cpu_startup_entry+0x36/0x40 [<0000000000119d00>] smp_start_secondary+0x140/0x150 [<0000000000f5d2ae>] restart_int_handler+0x6e/0x90 Mark arch_cpu_idle() noinstr like all other architectures with CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR (should) have it to fix this. Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
commit 60eed1e upstream. code path: ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents ocfs2_move_extents ocfs2_defrag_extent __ocfs2_move_extent + ocfs2_journal_access_di + ocfs2_split_extent //sub-paths call jbd2_journal_restart + ocfs2_journal_dirty //crash by jbs2 ASSERT crash stacks: PID: 11297 TASK: ffff974a676dcd00 CPU: 67 COMMAND: "defragfs.ocfs2" #0 [ffffb25d8dad3900] machine_kexec at ffffffff8386fe01 friendlyarm#1 [ffffb25d8dad3958] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8395959d friendlyarm#2 [ffffb25d8dad3a20] crash_kexec at ffffffff8395a45d friendlyarm#3 [ffffb25d8dad3a38] oops_end at ffffffff83836d3f friendlyarm#4 [ffffb25d8dad3a58] do_trap at ffffffff83833205 friendlyarm#5 [ffffb25d8dad3aa0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff83833aa6 friendlyarm#6 [ffffb25d8dad3ac0] invalid_op at ffffffff84200d18 [exception RIP: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x2ba] RIP: ffffffffc09ca54a RSP: ffffb25d8dad3b70 RFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9706eedc5248 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff97337029ea28 RDI: ffff9706eedc5250 RBP: ffff9703c3520200 R8: 000000000f46b0b2 R9: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000001000000fe R12: ffff97337029ea28 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9703de59bf60 R15: ffff9706eedc5250 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 friendlyarm#7 [ffffb25d8dad3ba8] ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc137fb95 [ocfs2] friendlyarm#8 [ffffb25d8dad3be8] __ocfs2_move_extent at ffffffffc139a950 [ocfs2] friendlyarm#9 [ffffb25d8dad3c80] ocfs2_defrag_extent at ffffffffc139b2d2 [ocfs2] Analysis This bug has the same root cause of 'commit 7f27ec9 ("ocfs2: call ocfs2_journal_access_di() before ocfs2_journal_dirty() in ocfs2_write_end_nolock()")'. For this bug, jbd2_journal_restart() is called by ocfs2_split_extent() during defragmenting. How to fix For ocfs2_split_extent() can handle journal operations totally by itself. Caller doesn't need to call journal access/dirty pair, and caller only needs to call journal start/stop pair. The fix method is to remove journal access/dirty from __ocfs2_move_extent(). The discussion for this patch: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2023-February/000647.html Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230217003717.32469-1-heming.zhao@suse.com Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn> Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit 3dca1f8 ] Don't hold sdw_dev_lock while calling the peripheral driver probe() and remove() callbacks. Holding sdw_dev_lock around the probe() and remove() calls causes a theoretical mutex inversion which lockdep will assert on. During probe() the sdw_dev_lock mutex is taken first and then ASoC/ALSA locks are taken by the probe() implementation. During normal operation ASoC can take its locks and then trigger a runtime resume of the component. The SoundWire resume will then take sdw_dev_lock. This is the reverse order compared to probe(). It's not necessary to hold sdw_dev_lock when calling the probe() and remove(), it is only used to prevent the bus core calling the driver callbacks if there isn't a driver or the driver is removing. All calls to the driver callbacks are guarded by the 'probed' flag. So if sdw_dev_lock is held while setting and clearing the 'probed' flag this is sufficient to guarantee the safety of callback functions. Removing the mutex from around the call to probe() means that it is now possible for a bus event (PING response) to be handled in parallel with the probe(). But sdw_bus_probe() already has handling for this by calling the device update_status() after the probe() has completed. Example lockdep assert: [ 46.098514] ====================================================== [ 46.104736] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 46.110961] 6.1.0-rc4-jamerson friendlyarm#1 Tainted: G E [ 46.116842] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 46.123063] mpg123/1130 is trying to acquire lock: [ 46.127883] ffff8b445031fb80 (&slave->sdw_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.137225] but task is already holding lock: [ 46.143074] ffffffffc1455310 (&card->pcm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpcm_fe_dai_open+0x49/0x830 [ 46.151536] which lock already depends on the new lock.[ 46.159732] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 46.167231] -> friendlyarm#4 (&card->pcm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.173428] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.177542] snd_soc_dpcm_runtime_update+0x2e/0x100 [ 46.182958] snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double+0x1c2/0x200 [ 46.188548] snd_ctl_elem_write+0x10c/0x1d0 [ 46.193268] snd_ctl_ioctl+0x126/0x850 [ 46.197556] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0 [ 46.201845] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.205959] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.211553] -> friendlyarm#3 (&card->controls_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 46.218188] down_write+0x2b/0xd0 [ 46.222038] snd_ctl_add_replace+0x39/0xb0 [ 46.226672] snd_soc_add_controls+0x53/0x80 [ 46.231393] soc_probe_component+0x1e4/0x2a0 [ 46.236202] snd_soc_bind_card+0x51a/0xc80 [ 46.240836] devm_snd_soc_register_card+0x43/0x90 [ 46.246079] mc_probe+0x982/0xfe0 [snd_soc_sof_sdw] [ 46.251500] platform_probe+0x3c/0xa0 [ 46.255700] really_probe+0xde/0x390 [ 46.259814] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x180 [ 46.264710] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 46.269347] __driver_attach+0x9f/0x1f0 [ 46.273721] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0 [ 46.278098] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x200 [ 46.282473] driver_register+0x8f/0xf0 [ 46.286759] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x310 [ 46.291136] do_init_module+0x4c/0x1f0 [ 46.295422] __do_sys_finit_module+0xb4/0x130 [ 46.300321] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.304434] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.310027] -> friendlyarm#2 (&card->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.315883] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.320000] snd_soc_bind_card+0x3e/0xc80 [ 46.324551] devm_snd_soc_register_card+0x43/0x90 [ 46.329798] mc_probe+0x982/0xfe0 [snd_soc_sof_sdw] [ 46.335219] platform_probe+0x3c/0xa0 [ 46.339420] really_probe+0xde/0x390 [ 46.343532] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x180 [ 46.348430] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 46.353065] __driver_attach+0x9f/0x1f0 [ 46.357437] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0 [ 46.361812] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x200 [ 46.366716] driver_register+0x8f/0xf0 [ 46.371528] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x310 [ 46.376424] do_init_module+0x4c/0x1f0 [ 46.381239] __do_sys_finit_module+0xb4/0x130 [ 46.386665] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.391299] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.397416] -> friendlyarm#1 (client_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.404307] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.408941] snd_soc_add_component+0x24/0x2c0 [ 46.414345] devm_snd_soc_register_component+0x54/0xa0 [ 46.420522] cs35l56_common_probe+0x280/0x370 [snd_soc_cs35l56] [ 46.427487] cs35l56_sdw_probe+0xf4/0x170 [snd_soc_cs35l56_sdw] [ 46.434442] sdw_drv_probe+0x80/0x1a0 [ 46.439136] really_probe+0xde/0x390 [ 46.443738] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x180 [ 46.449120] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 46.454247] __driver_attach+0x9f/0x1f0 [ 46.459106] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0 [ 46.463971] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x200 [ 46.468825] driver_register+0x8f/0xf0 [ 46.473592] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x310 [ 46.478441] do_init_module+0x4c/0x1f0 [ 46.483202] __do_sys_finit_module+0xb4/0x130 [ 46.488572] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.493158] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.499229] -> #0 (&slave->sdw_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.506737] __lock_acquire+0x1121/0x1df0 [ 46.511765] lock_acquire+0xd5/0x300 [ 46.516360] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.520949] sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.526409] sdw_clear_slave_status+0xd8/0xe0 [ 46.531783] intel_resume_runtime+0x139/0x2a0 [ 46.537155] __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120 [ 46.541919] rpm_callback+0x5d/0x70 [ 46.546422] rpm_resume+0x531/0x7e0 [ 46.550920] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80 [ 46.556024] snd_soc_pcm_component_pm_runtime_get+0x2f/0xc0 [ 46.562611] __soc_pcm_open+0x62/0x520 [ 46.567375] dpcm_be_dai_startup+0x116/0x210 [ 46.572661] dpcm_fe_dai_open+0xf7/0x830 [ 46.577597] snd_pcm_open_substream+0x54a/0x8b0 [ 46.583145] snd_pcm_open.part.0+0xdc/0x200 [ 46.588341] snd_pcm_playback_open+0x51/0x80 [ 46.593625] chrdev_open+0xc0/0x250 [ 46.598129] do_dentry_open+0x15f/0x430 [ 46.602981] path_openat+0x75e/0xa80 [ 46.607575] do_filp_open+0xb2/0x160 [ 46.612162] do_sys_openat2+0x9a/0x160 [ 46.616922] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 46.621767] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.626352] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.632414] other info that might help us debug this:[ 46.641862] Chain exists of: &slave->sdw_dev_lock --> &card->controls_rwsem --> &card->pcm_mutex[ 46.655145] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 46.662048] CPU0 CPU1 [ 46.667080] ---- ---- [ 46.672108] lock(&card->pcm_mutex); [ 46.676267] lock(&card->controls_rwsem); [ 46.683382] lock(&card->pcm_mutex); [ 46.690063] lock(&slave->sdw_dev_lock); [ 46.694574] *** DEADLOCK ***[ 46.701942] 2 locks held by mpg123/1130: [ 46.706356] #0: ffff8b4457b22b90 (&pcm->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_pcm_open.part.0+0xc9/0x200 [ 46.715999] friendlyarm#1: ffffffffc1455310 (&card->pcm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpcm_fe_dai_open+0x49/0x830 [ 46.725390] stack backtrace: [ 46.730752] CPU: 0 PID: 1130 Comm: mpg123 Tainted: G E 6.1.0-rc4-jamerson friendlyarm#1 [ 46.739703] Hardware name: AAEON UP-WHL01/UP-WHL01, BIOS UPW1AM19 11/10/2020 [ 46.747270] Call Trace: [ 46.750239] <TASK> [ 46.752857] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73 [ 46.757045] check_noncircular+0x102/0x120 [ 46.761664] __lock_acquire+0x1121/0x1df0 [ 46.766197] lock_acquire+0xd5/0x300 [ 46.770292] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.775432] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140 [ 46.780143] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.784241] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.789387] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [ 46.793750] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.798894] ? lock_release+0x147/0x2f0 [ 46.803262] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x250 [ 46.808315] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.813456] sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.818422] sdw_clear_slave_status+0xd8/0xe0 [ 46.823302] ? pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x30/0x30 [ 46.828706] intel_resume_runtime+0x139/0x2a0 [ 46.833583] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [ 46.838462] ? pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x30/0x30 [ 46.843866] __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120 [ 46.848142] ? pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x30/0x30 [ 46.853550] rpm_callback+0x5d/0x70 [ 46.857568] rpm_resume+0x531/0x7e0 [ 46.861578] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x62/0x70 [ 46.866634] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80 [ 46.871258] snd_soc_pcm_component_pm_runtime_get+0x2f/0xc0 [ 46.877358] __soc_pcm_open+0x62/0x520 [ 46.881634] ? dpcm_add_paths.isra.0+0x35d/0x4c0 [ 46.886784] dpcm_be_dai_startup+0x116/0x210 [ 46.891592] dpcm_fe_dai_open+0xf7/0x830 [ 46.896046] ? debug_mutex_init+0x33/0x50 [ 46.900591] snd_pcm_open_substream+0x54a/0x8b0 [ 46.905658] snd_pcm_open.part.0+0xdc/0x200 [ 46.910376] ? wake_up_q+0x90/0x90 [ 46.914312] snd_pcm_playback_open+0x51/0x80 [ 46.919118] chrdev_open+0xc0/0x250 [ 46.923147] ? cdev_device_add+0x90/0x90 [ 46.927608] do_dentry_open+0x15f/0x430 [ 46.931976] path_openat+0x75e/0xa80 [ 46.936086] do_filp_open+0xb2/0x160 [ 46.940194] ? lock_release+0x147/0x2f0 [ 46.944563] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [ 46.949101] do_sys_openat2+0x9a/0x160 [ 46.953377] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 46.957733] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.961829] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.967402] RIP: 0033:0x7fa6397ccd3b [ 46.971506] Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 4b 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 67 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 91 00 00 00 48 8b 4c 24 28 64 48 33 0c 25 [ 46.991413] RSP: 002b:00007fff838e8990 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 [ 46.999580] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000080802 RCX: 00007fa6397ccd3b [ 47.007311] RDX: 0000000000080802 RSI: 00007fff838e8b50 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c [ 47.015047] RBP: 00007fff838e8b50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000011 [ 47.022787] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000080802 [ 47.030539] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff838e8b50 [ 47.038289] </TASK> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230123172520.339367-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
commit 8f121df upstream. As the call trace shown, the root cause is kunmap incorrect pages: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000 CPU: 1 PID: 40 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc5 friendlyarm#4 Workqueue: erofs_worker z_erofs_decompressqueue_work EIP: z_erofs_lzma_decompress+0x34b/0x8ac z_erofs_decompress+0x12/0x14 z_erofs_decompress_queue+0x7e7/0xb1c z_erofs_decompressqueue_work+0x32/0x60 process_one_work+0x24b/0x4d8 ? process_one_work+0x1a4/0x4d8 worker_thread+0x14c/0x3fc kthread+0xe6/0x10c ? rescuer_thread+0x358/0x358 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x18/0x18 ret_from_fork+0x1c/0x28 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The bug is trivial and should be fixed now. It has no impact on !HIGHMEM platforms. Fixes: 622cead ("erofs: lzma compression support") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+ Reviewed-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230305134455.88236-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit 13085e1 ] The following LOCKDEP was detected: Workqueue: events smc_lgr_free_work [smc] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.1.0-20221027.rc2.git8.56bc5b569087.300.fc36.s390x+debug friendlyarm#1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/3:0/176251 is trying to acquire lock: 00000000f1467148 ((wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_workqueue+0x7a/0x4f0 but task is already holding lock: 0000037fffe97dc8 ((work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x232/0x730 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> friendlyarm#4 ((work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 __flush_work+0x76/0xf0 __cancel_work_timer+0x170/0x220 __smc_lgr_terminate.part.0+0x34/0x1c0 [smc] smc_connect_rdma+0x15e/0x418 [smc] __smc_connect+0x234/0x480 [smc] smc_connect+0x1d6/0x230 [smc] __sys_connect+0x90/0xc0 __do_sys_socketcall+0x186/0x370 __do_syscall+0x1da/0x208 system_call+0x82/0xb0 -> friendlyarm#3 (smc_client_lgr_pending){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 __mutex_lock+0x96/0x8e8 mutex_lock_nested+0x32/0x40 smc_connect_rdma+0xa4/0x418 [smc] __smc_connect+0x234/0x480 [smc] smc_connect+0x1d6/0x230 [smc] __sys_connect+0x90/0xc0 __do_sys_socketcall+0x186/0x370 __do_syscall+0x1da/0x208 system_call+0x82/0xb0 -> friendlyarm#2 (sk_lock-AF_SMC){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 lock_sock_nested+0x46/0xa8 smc_tx_work+0x34/0x50 [smc] process_one_work+0x30c/0x730 worker_thread+0x62/0x420 kthread+0x138/0x150 __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 -> friendlyarm#1 ((work_completion)(&(&smc->conn.tx_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 process_one_work+0x2bc/0x730 worker_thread+0x62/0x420 kthread+0x138/0x150 __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 -> #0 ((wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xd8/0xe88 validate_chain+0x70c/0xb20 __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 __flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x4f0 drain_workqueue+0xaa/0x158 destroy_workqueue+0x44/0x2d8 smc_lgr_free+0x9e/0xf8 [smc] process_one_work+0x30c/0x730 worker_thread+0x62/0x420 kthread+0x138/0x150 __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2 --> smc_client_lgr_pending --> (work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work)); lock(smc_client_lgr_pending); lock((work_completion) (&(&lgr->free_work)->work)); lock((wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/3:0/176251: #0: 0000000080183548 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x232/0x730 friendlyarm#1: 0000037fffe97dc8 ((work_completion) (&(&lgr->free_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x232/0x730 stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 176251 Comm: kworker/3:0 Not tainted Hardware name: IBM 8561 T01 701 (z/VM 7.2.0) Call Trace: [<000000002983c3e4>] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0x100 [<0000000028b477ae>] check_noncircular+0x13e/0x160 [<0000000028b48808>] check_prev_add+0xd8/0xe88 [<0000000028b49cc4>] validate_chain+0x70c/0xb20 [<0000000028b4bd26>] __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 [<0000000028b4cf6a>] lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 [<0000000028b4d17c>] lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 [<0000000028addaaa>] __flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x4f0 [<0000000028addf9a>] drain_workqueue+0xaa/0x158 [<0000000028ae303c>] destroy_workqueue+0x44/0x2d8 [<000003ff8029af26>] smc_lgr_free+0x9e/0xf8 [smc] [<0000000028adf3d4>] process_one_work+0x30c/0x730 [<0000000028adf85a>] worker_thread+0x62/0x420 [<0000000028aeac50>] kthread+0x138/0x150 [<0000000028a63914>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 [<00000000298503da>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 INFO: lockdep is turned off. =================================================================== This deadlock occurs because cancel_delayed_work_sync() waits for the work(&lgr->free_work) to finish, while the &lgr->free_work waits for the work(lgr->tx_wq), which needs the sk_lock-AF_SMC, that is already used under the mutex_lock. The solution is to use cancel_delayed_work() instead, which kills off a pending work. Fixes: a52bcc9 ("net/smc: improve termination processing") Signed-off-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Karcher <jaka@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit 2b4cc3d ] The check introduced in the commit a5fd394 ("igc: Lift TAPRIO schedule restriction") can detect a false positive error in some corner case. For instance, tc qdisc replace ... taprio num_tc 4 ... sched-entry S 0x01 100000 # slot#1 sched-entry S 0x03 100000 # slot#2 sched-entry S 0x04 100000 # slot#3 sched-entry S 0x08 200000 # slot#4 flags 0x02 # hardware offload Here the queue#0 (the first queue) is on at the slot#1 and friendlyarm#2, and off at the slot#3 and friendlyarm#4. Under the current logic, when the slot#4 is examined, validate_schedule() returns *false* since the enablement count for the queue#0 is two and it is already off at the previous slot (i.e. friendlyarm#3). But this definition is truely correct. Let's fix the logic to enforce a strict validation for consecutively-opened slots. Fixes: a5fd394 ("igc: Lift TAPRIO schedule restriction") Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com> Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
pikatenor
pushed a commit
to pikatenor/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit 4e264be ] When a system with E810 with existing VFs gets rebooted the following hang may be observed. Pid 1 is hung in iavf_remove(), part of a network driver: PID: 1 TASK: ffff965400e5a340 CPU: 24 COMMAND: "systemd-shutdow" #0 [ffffaad04005fa50] __schedule at ffffffff8b3239cb friendlyarm#1 [ffffaad04005fae8] schedule at ffffffff8b323e2d friendlyarm#2 [ffffaad04005fb00] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock at ffffffff8b32cebc friendlyarm#3 [ffffaad04005fb80] usleep_range_state at ffffffff8b32c930 friendlyarm#4 [ffffaad04005fbb0] iavf_remove at ffffffffc12b9b4c [iavf] friendlyarm#5 [ffffaad04005fbf0] pci_device_remove at ffffffff8add7513 friendlyarm#6 [ffffaad04005fc10] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff8af08baa friendlyarm#7 [ffffaad04005fc40] pci_stop_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc5fc friendlyarm#8 [ffffaad04005fc60] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc81e friendlyarm#9 [ffffaad04005fc70] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at ffffffff8adf9429 torvalds#10 [ffffaad04005fca8] sriov_disable at ffffffff8adf98e4 torvalds#11 [ffffaad04005fcc8] ice_free_vfs at ffffffffc04bb2c8 [ice] torvalds#12 [ffffaad04005fd10] ice_remove at ffffffffc04778fe [ice] torvalds#13 [ffffaad04005fd38] ice_shutdown at ffffffffc0477946 [ice] torvalds#14 [ffffaad04005fd50] pci_device_shutdown at ffffffff8add58f1 torvalds#15 [ffffaad04005fd70] device_shutdown at ffffffff8af05386 torvalds#16 [ffffaad04005fd98] kernel_restart at ffffffff8a92a870 torvalds#17 [ffffaad04005fda8] __do_sys_reboot at ffffffff8a92abd6 torvalds#18 [ffffaad04005fee0] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317159 torvalds#19 [ffffaad04005ff08] __context_tracking_enter at ffffffff8b31b6fc torvalds#20 [ffffaad04005ff18] syscall_exit_to_user_mode at ffffffff8b31b50d torvalds#21 [ffffaad04005ff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317169 torvalds#22 [ffffaad04005ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8b40009b RIP: 00007f1baa5c13d7 RSP: 00007fffbcc55a98 RFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1baa5c13d7 RDX: 0000000001234567 RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI: 00000000fee1dead RBP: 00007fffbcc55ca0 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 00007fffbcc54e90 R10: 00007fffbcc55050 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fffbcc55af0 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9 CS: 0033 SS: 002b During reboot all drivers PM shutdown callbacks are invoked. In iavf_shutdown() the adapter state is changed to __IAVF_REMOVE. In ice_shutdown() the call chain above is executed, which at some point calls iavf_remove(). However iavf_remove() expects the VF to be in one of the states __IAVF_RUNNING, __IAVF_DOWN or __IAVF_INIT_FAILED. If that's not the case it sleeps forever. So if iavf_shutdown() gets invoked before iavf_remove() the system will hang indefinitely because the adapter is already in state __IAVF_REMOVE. Fix this by returning from iavf_remove() if the state is __IAVF_REMOVE, as we already went through iavf_shutdown(). Fixes: 9745780 ("iavf: Add waiting so the port is initialized in remove") Fixes: a841733 ("iavf: Fix race condition between iavf_shutdown and iavf_remove") Reported-by: Marius Cornea <mcornea@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com> Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: perfectnewer weixipeng@outlook.com