-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 904
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: update react-dnd #531
Conversation
After upgrading to react-dnd 9.3.4 sortable tree without dnd context is not working. So I'm looking forward to see the update comming soon :) |
Does this finish up #507 and ring in a sortable tree 2.6.3? |
I fixed all issues with jest and added prepare script to install my fork from github (but it still doesn't work). All test have passed, so I think it could be merged into master and released as 2.6.3. |
Hello @fritz-c && @wuweiweiwu , Are you thinking about developing the library further and accepting PullRequests? |
If someone want working "scripts": {
+ "postinstall": "yarn --cwd ./node_modules/react-sortable-tree run buildOnly",
},
"dependencies": {
- "react-sortable-tree": "2.6.2",
+ "react-sortable-tree": "github:kserjey/react-sortable-tree",
},
"devDependencies": {
+ "rollup": "^1.21.4",
+ "rollup-plugin-babel": "^4.3.3",
+ "rollup-plugin-commonjs": "^10.1.0",
+ "rollup-plugin-node-resolve": "^5.2.0",
+ "rollup-plugin-postcss": "^2.0.3",
} |
merged! Thank you :D |
@lifejuggler , is there any reason we jumped from dnd@7.7.0 to dnd@9.4.0?
|
@shiraze this was done in part to modernize the library and potentially deal with security vulnerabilities that might comeup with having an outdated library. if you had ecountered the failing test can you write a ticket for it and I will try to investigate when I have the time... which now a days seems to be almost nonexistant... if this is a big problem I can also revert the merge until all the issues have been addressed |
@lifejuggler , we've got around the issue by updating our Jest config to include:
I'm not sure why Jest is attempting to test with files in the I'd only consider a revert if others are stuck (although they can do what I did!) |
No description provided.