New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support GHC 8.6.2 #74
Conversation
Not sure why this is wedged in the builders. |
@patrickt: I selected the wrong job in the branch protection settings. Fixed that. |
Thanks so much @jkachmar!
I’ve no objection so long as they’re cool with having a 0.x package in there. (In particular, we aren’t promising API stability quite yet.) |
Thanks for getting this merged in! I don't think there should be any objection to API stability, and once the updated version is published to Hackage I can run the Stackage curator again to make sure that everything works together. How would you like the attribution/maintainership to be set up in Stackage? e.g. @patrickt is the Stackage maintainer for |
@jkachmar: Could you make me the maintainer, with |
(I’ve just published 0.1.2.0 to hackage today: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/fused-effects-0.1.2.0) |
This adds support and CI coverage for GHC 8.6.2.
If this looks good, and CI passes smoothly, would you be amenable to this package being added to the Stackage nightly snapshots?