PgUsers.java:106-112: This class represents details about...

[0pdd]

The puzzle 18-891197cc from #18 has to be resolved:

ghman/src/main/java/com/g4s8/ghman/data/PgUsers.java

Lines 106 to 112 in b7aabd5

	* @todo #18:30min This class represents details about a user stored in
	* the database. Callers of PgUser.telegram relies on the datastructure
	* defined here and must know how it is structured to exploit the
	* information. Instead, extract interface from it and use it
	* everywhere it is needed instead of exposing this data. One
	* implementation is maybe based on Chat and another would be based on
	* a pg request for example. Add unit tests for both when it's done.

The puzzle was created by @rultor on 25-Jun-19.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

[0crat]

@g4s8/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

Job #53 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

The job #53 assigned to @olenagerasimova/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

Job gh:g4s8/ghman#53 already assigned to @olenagerasimova, can't assign to @olenagerasimova

[0crat]

Job gh:g4s8/ghman#53 already assigned to @olenagerasimova, can't assign to @olenagerasimova

[victornoel]

@0pdd as a complement: The todo is about extracting an interface from JsonUserDetails (could be named UserDetails?) and bring the inner class out of the PgUsers class in order to make it public and write unit tests for it.

[olenagerasimova]

@0crat wait for #72 review/merge

[0crat]

@0crat wait for #72 review/merge (here)

@olenagerasimova The impediment for #53 was registered successfully by @olenagerasimova/z

[victornoel]

@g4s8 @olenagerasimova following the discussion in #72 (comment), I believe that the best course of action is to not solve this @todo but simply remove it and forget about it.
For the record, this is so because this @todo was incorrectly introduced.

[olenagerasimova]

@0crat refuse

[olenagerasimova]

@0crat status

[0crat]

@0crat status (here)

@olenagerasimova This is what I know about this job in CJT4R32Q3, as in §32:

• The job #53 is in scope for 9mon
• The role is DEV
• The job is assigned to @olenagerasimova/z for 9mon
• There is no monetary reward attached, it's a free job
• Some equity will be vested on completion
• The job has an impediment
• The budget is 30 minutes/points
• These users are banned and won't be assigned:
  • @0pdd/z: This user reported the ticket
• Job footprint (restricted area)

[0crat]

@0crat refuse (here)

@olenagerasimova The user @olenagerasimova/z resigned from #53, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled