You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we are having issues with the quality control of the MAE module's RNA-DNA matching. Maybe you can help us figure out what's going wrong?
We use RNA and DNA from tumor tissue (a specific cancer) rather than normal tissue. According to the results, none of our samples match. The median proportion of matching is between 0.64 and 0.74. We have triple checked that the BAM and VCF pairs belong to the same person.
Could this be because we are using tumor samples instead of normal tissue? Or could it have something to do with the way the VCF files are filtered?
Thank you for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Yes, it could be due to having tumor samples there's a higher proportion of variants not present in both the DNA and RNA. Did you get to create the histogram with the matching rates? You should, nonetheless, be able to see 2 populations.
Hello,
we are having issues with the quality control of the MAE module's RNA-DNA matching. Maybe you can help us figure out what's going wrong?
We use RNA and DNA from tumor tissue (a specific cancer) rather than normal tissue. According to the results, none of our samples match. The median proportion of matching is between 0.64 and 0.74. We have triple checked that the BAM and VCF pairs belong to the same person.
Could this be because we are using tumor samples instead of normal tissue? Or could it have something to do with the way the VCF files are filtered?
Thank you for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: