Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove linting that broke the functionality of jstree module #617

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 19, 2015

Conversation

martenson
Copy link
Member

Subsequentially breaking everything that was using jstree as format in remote_files.py API controller

Probably broken in this commit: 5cd3e3a
I am putting it back to the former state. I also think that if we did not write most of the code, we should not be linting it.

probably this commit: galaxyproject@5cd3e3a
putting it back to the former state, we did not write most of the code, we should not be linting it
@martenson martenson changed the title remove linting that broke the functionality of this module remove linting that broke the functionality of jstree module Aug 19, 2015
@martenson
Copy link
Member Author

I would like to put htis file on linting blacklist but will await some feedback. ping @nsoranzo

@dannon
Copy link
Member

dannon commented Aug 19, 2015

@martenson You're right, we shouldn't have linted this. Blacklist it, sounds good.

@jxtx
Copy link
Contributor

jxtx commented Aug 19, 2015

Can we move all stuff like this that we didn't write and is licensed differently under a parent module (say galaxy.external) and blacklist that?

@martenson
Copy link
Member Author

@jxtx I opened an issue for it here #618

nsoranzo added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2015
remove linting that broke the functionality of jstree module
@nsoranzo nsoranzo merged commit fb11d71 into galaxyproject:dev Aug 19, 2015
@martenson martenson deleted the remove-broken-linting-jstree branch August 19, 2015 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants