-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide a target_nside parameter to the smoothing function #91
Comments
I'm already doing map2alm and alm2map in: https://github.com/galsci/pysm/blob/main/pysm3/models/template.py#L99-L152 so it is as easy as providing an extra parameter |
from @seclark:
|
suggestion my Martin Reinecke, what if we used Gauss Legendre (GL) pixelization internally? So:
I anyone used GL pixelization before, please jump in. Otherwise, I'll give it a try myself using |
thanks to @mreineck providing an example of using |
Good to see that this works well! Just one word of caution: since the rings of a GL grid are not equidistant in theta, the GL map plots in the notebook can only be a rough approximantion to the real map; doing this accurately requires using the exact coordinates of every ring (obtainable, e.g., via |
will try with a more anisotropic map, for example the GNILC dust maps after adding small scales (#97), which is one of our use cases. We want to verify if error in HEALPix goes higher in such maps. |
@seclark @brandonshensley I have added a section in the docs about dealing with Nside, see the commit reference above here. |
target_nside
parameter, so people can smooth a 1024 map and get a 512 output without transforming twice.Originally posted by @zonca in #90 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: