Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update terraform-provider-aws and terraform-provider-google #84

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2021
Merged

Update terraform-provider-aws and terraform-provider-google #84

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2021

Conversation

ialidzhikov
Copy link
Member

/area quality
/kind enhancement

With the new versions of terraform-provider-aws and terraform-provider-google I locally successfully validated the following scenarios for both of the providers:

  • reconciliation of existing Infrastructure
  • deletion of existing Infrastructure
  • creation and deletion of new Infrastructure (single zone, new vpc)
  • creation and deletion of new Infrastructure (multiple zones, new vpc) (not applicable for gcp as gcp Infrastructure is not zoned)
  • creation and deletion of new Infrastructure (single zone, existing vpc)

Release note:

The following terraform provider plugins are updated:
- hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws: 3.18.0 -> 3.32.0
- hashicorp/terraform-provider-google: 3.27.0 -> 3.59.0
- hashicorp/terraform-provider-google-beta: 3.27.0 -> 3.59.0

@ialidzhikov
Update hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws
320ca1e 
from 3.18.0 to 3.32.0

Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
@ialidzhikov
Update hashicorp/terraform-provider-google
1bf39af 
from 3.27.0 to 3.59.0

Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2021 13:55
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Mar 12, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Mar 12, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Mar 12, 2021
rfranzke
rfranzke approved these changes Mar 12, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@rfranzke rfranzke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Mar 12, 2021
dkistner
dkistner approved these changes Mar 15, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@dkistner dkistner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@timebertt timebertt merged commit 7812328 into gardener:master Mar 15, 2021
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov deleted the enh/update-providers branch March 27, 2021 16:33
@vpnachev vpnachev mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2021
Merged
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dkistner dkistner dkistner approved these changes

@rfranzke rfranzke rfranzke approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@ialidzhikov @dkistner @rfranzke @gardener-robot-ci-1 @timebertt @gardener-robot-ci-3 @gardener-robot