You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We can move from major topic to TOC by clicking the number beside major topic and if we click on title of major topic we move to corresponding tag in gateoverflow site. Finding the option to move to TOC is very difficult because if we click on number beside sub topic or if we click on titles of sub topic it moves to same i.e., corresponding tag in gateoverflow site whereas clicking on number beside major topic and title of major topic is doing a different operation. This leads to confusion.
So my suggestion is to add top button beside every major topic and hyperlink it to TOC so that there will be no confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
They are working but there is a confusion. See the following video
TOC.mp4
If I click on Discrete Mathematics: Set Theory & Algebra it is redirecting to GO website and if click on (161) it is redirecting to TOC. Whereas on clicking either Binary Operation or (8) both are redirecting to GO website and this might lead to confusion because most people might think that topic name and (No. of questions) are hyperlinked to same. So add top button beside Discrete Mathematics: Set Theory & Algebra (161) and hyperlink top button to TOC.
We can move from major topic to TOC by clicking the number beside major topic and if we click on title of major topic we move to corresponding tag in gateoverflow site. Finding the option to move to TOC is very difficult because if we click on number beside sub topic or if we click on titles of sub topic it moves to same i.e., corresponding tag in gateoverflow site whereas clicking on number beside major topic and title of major topic is doing a different operation. This leads to confusion.
So my suggestion is to add top button beside every major topic and hyperlink it to TOC so that there will be no confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: