-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support new DwC terms (dwc:vitality) #2095
Comments
Thank you for contacting us. |
The IPT definitions have not yet been updated to contain the 2023 changes of DwC. I can't see why this should not be done immediately so they become available in IPTs even if GBIF doesn't support all new terms yet. There apparently is an open pull request to do so: gbif/rs.gbif.org#111 |
So what is the right way to ask for the pull request to be approved? |
If it helps to know, we're preparing the GBIF UAT environment now to support all terms and we'll prepare some test datasets to verify everything works. That will remain in test for around 4 weeks because we're heading into a very busy time with TDWG and the GBIF governing board, and because it includes changes to the date range interpretation . In early November, we anticipate GBIF.org and IPTs being fully up to date with the latest DwC. It may be possible to release the IPT schemas to production earlier, but we need to verify if those changes will not break anything in the existing GBIF ingestion. |
Thank you for the update. |
related gbif/pipelines#926 |
Hi all, The new terms are now ready for use in the IPT, and will be interpreted and shown on GBIF.org and in the API. |
I'm working with a dataset of wildlife strandings, I just found that the vitality term was adopted I tried to update our strandings dataset but while mapping the Occurrence Core there wasnt a Vitality term on the IPT.
Maybe there is another Core in which this term should be mapped?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: