-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cellular processes missing cellular process parent #12796
Comments
Note that the definition of cellular process is: Any process that is carried out at the cellular level, but not necessarily restricted to a single cell. For example, cell communication occurs among more than one cell, but occurs at the cellular level. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Is it really worth distinguishing things 'at the cellular level' in GO? |
It might not be but we always have. Its probably more useful for multicellular eukaryotes? |
"cellular process" |
With LEGO, we can capture the location of where functions and processes are occurring in a much better way. It doesn't have to be fuzzy 'at the level of'. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Is there an easy way at present to distinguish all cell level things from the tissue level/behaviour/homeostasis of number of cells/ system process etc? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The transport one might have been my edits while cleaning up to improve inference. The ideal way to fix it would be to have a term for 'cellular transport' to use as the genus. Unfortunately we don't have this term. We could assert 'cellular process' as a parent, but the logical definition: transport may result in classifications that contradict that in future. For example, transport in exosomes between cells is vesicle mediated, but is this cellular (?)
How about: A process occurring in or involving exactly one cell? But note: cellular component organization includes organization of extracellular structures, which doesn't fit this def. |
Cell level processes shouldn't exclude "organization of extracellular structures".
We (pombase curators), are thinking that all things mediated by a single cell are cellular . However, we are now tripping up over "conjugation" in fungi, which is mediated by more than one cell, but we still think of as cellular, so this is not "sufficient". Unless of course we accept that conjugation is not cellular....? |
Some parts of conjugation are mediated by a single cell (shmooing), and some parts (cytogamy) are not cellular...so perhaps that would be fine. The parts which are cellular would have cellular process parents. |
"Cell level processes shouldn't exclude "organization of extracellular structures." Then I think we're stuck with the existing def (and lots of tickets arguing over it...) If we agree that everything that occurs in a cell is cellular, we could at least automate some of this by adding the axiom: biological_process that occurs_in some cell SubClassOf: 'cellular process' @cmungall Do we have a place where GCIs like this can live? |
In this case, it wouldn't go to the header, it would look like this:
http://owlcollab.github.io/oboformat/doc/obo-syntax.html#5.2.2 This will look confusing in OE, as OE doesn't take into account qualifiers in making the hierarchy We'd want to filter this axiom from the public obo releases. Alternatively, we could PATO-shunt this to a cellular quality. The GCI would then live in pato_ext. Ad we'd have an equiv axiom on cellular process. But overall I think we need to rethink the whole cellular-X thing |
So as not to divert this ticket I started a document with some thoughts about problems with cellular-X terms: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QpfUY_LgeIryMj6EEAE05FXLE_894GalkerBU8dMuVU/edit this is in the GO drive, in the ontology folder. I like keeping things in the tracker but google docs can be useful for things like this |
Is there any action that I could/should take on the particular terms that Val has brought to our attention? Two suggestions from @dosumis:
may result in classifications that contradict that in future. For example, transport in exosomes between cells is vesicle mediated, but is this cellular (?)
biological_process that occurs_in some cell SubClassOf: 'cellular process' (see Chris' response above to why that might be problematic) |
Linking to the bigger issue #12849 |
Even though this might be a "bigger issue" it looks very odd to a biologist that none of these terms are is_a "cellular process" Could these links be instantiated and this ticket closed pending the "bigger issue" #12849 ticket? Note, this ticket was opened in 2016 so the "longer-term solution" does not seem to be imminent. |
Don't the logical definitions sort situations like this? It's quite 'high-level" stuff. |
Changed subclasses:
|
Also added 'cellular process' subclass to:
|
added cellular process subclass fixes #12796
I spotted
GO:0071840 cellular component organization or biogenesis
GO:0055085 transmembrane transport]have both had "cellular process" parent deleted.
GO:0016192 vesicle-mediated transport
GO:0006913 nucleocytoplasmic transport
GO:0007034 vacuolar transport
lost "cellular process parent"
Any reason for that?
GO:0097428 protein maturation by iron-sulfur cluster transfer
(but this never had it)
val
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: