-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use relation in GPAD col 3 (qualifiers) for predicate #20
Comments
Correction: Previous rule 3 above still holds for Also, when |
Still need to handle NOT qualifiers. |
Do we have an example of a full gpad/gaf line with a NOT into Turtle? I'm a little confused by what this TTL is and how it relates to the image shown above. |
@dougli1sqrd See http://noctua-dev.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:5c533d1100000051 e.g. gpad: FB FBgn0015926 enables|NOT GO:0019003 pmid:17 ECO:0007651 20190201 GO_Central contributor=http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7334-7852|noctua-model-id=gomodel:5c533d1100000051|model-state=development OWL:
|
Closing this since it's pretty much done. In general, the qualifiers are being used in the models. If not verbatim, they are translated to some other form. The only remaining issue is handling the NOT qualifier and this has a separate ticket #10 open for it. |
We had initially decided to infer this GO-CAM structure from an annotation's aspect:
Since we're now using GPAD, where the relation is explicitly stated, we can just create triples using this instead (after converting to RO of course). So, for this example line (where
involved_in
translates toRO:0002331
):Triple will be
WB:WBGene00000001-RO:0002331->GO:0008286
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: