dev-python/kaitaistruct: Introducing new package

[bucefal91]

Introducing dev-python/kaitaistruct into Gentoo repository.

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/654860
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.33, Repoman-2.3.9

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: dev-python/kaitaistruct

dev-python/kaitaistruct: @gentoo/proxy-maint (new package)

Bugs linked: 654860

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

---

Gentoo Mirror & CI services are provided by Michał Górny. The hardware was kindly provided by Todd Goodman. This unofficial service is not associated with Gentoo Infrastructure or Gentoo Foundation.

This service is provided by the service provider "as is" and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. In no event shall the service provider be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data, or profits; or business interruption) however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability, or tort (including negligence or otherwise) arising in any way out of the use of this service, even if advised of the possibility of such damage.

[ConiKost]

HTTPS please

[ConiKost]

Drop it, if empty.

[bucefal91]

@ConiKost Hello :) thanks for reviewing my stuff!

I believe I have processed your feedback (will be processing now in other pull requests too).

[ConiKost]

Why not directly newest 0.8 release?

[ConiKost]

python3_6 is missing, is this correct?

[bucefal91]

Somehow my search engine (duckduck go) threw me onto 0.7 and I didn't bother to make sure it was the latest release (I just assumed I would magically land onto the freshest one from the search results).

So I added 0.8.ebuild too. I also looked into supported versions as reported by https://pypi.org/project/kaitaistruct/0.{7,8}/ and written corresponding stuff into PYTHON_COMPAT. I also removed python3_3 as per https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Python/Implementations it's no longer supported.

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2018-06-05 15:14 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 954b177
Status: ✅ good

No issues found

[mgorny]

Is this also part of something bigger? If yes, then I would propose I'll just mark this one as reviewed but merge them all together.

[bucefal91]

@mgorny , yes, it is a dependency of net-proxy/mitmproxy-3.0.4 https://bugs.gentoo.org/572170

I might be wrong, but I think repoman wouldn't allow me to commit or QA bot would throw tons of errors if I file a pull request for mitmproxy and one of its dependencies would be missing in the main gentoo tree (though present in my overlay). I have a ready & functional mitmproxy-3.0.4.ebuild; I didn't file pull request for it precisely because the dependencies were missing.

[mgorny]

Let me rephrase. Let's review all the deps you have filed already, then close them and file one pull request containing all packages. Would that work for you?

[bucefal91]

Yes, sure :)

Currently open I have for net-proxy/mitmproxy:

• this one
• dev-python/h11: Introducing new package #8262 (I have things to do there... will try to process your feedback today/tomorrow)
• dev-python/brotlipy: Introducing the package #8261 (also I have to go through your feedback there)

And for authenticator:

• dev-python/pyotp: Introducing new package #8282 (seems like nobody from proxying maintainers have reviewed it yet). At least I haven't got there not a single comment nor positive or negative.

[bucefal91]

@mgorny In your last comment to this pull request you said you'd like to merge a bunch of dev-python/* packages I've been working on once they are all settled. Looks like they are all reviewed (some of them are already merged by you), the ones that are still not:

• this one.
• dev-python/h11: Introducing new package #8262 - I've gone through your feedback and I hope it's ready for merge too.

Do you want me to squash it into a single commit or how do you want to proceed? :)

[mgorny]

Nah, just leave it as is and I'll test both soonish.