Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GCHP 14.2.2 simulation fails because of KPP error #372

Closed
4 tasks
hazel008 opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
4 tasks

GCHP 14.2.2 simulation fails because of KPP error #372

hazel008 opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hazel008
Copy link

Name and Institution (Required)

Name: Hansen Cao
Institution: University of York

Confirm you have reviewed the following documentation

Description of your issue or question

Hello,

My GCHP fullchem simulation (v14.2.2 with debromination on by default) at C48 failed due to KPP error. I tried tightening the convergence criteria, which did not help. It seems that the KPP error is related to halogen explosion, see below the species concentrations in the problem box (4 7 16):
-9.3472878502639567E+019 HOBr
9.3457223154611585E+019 Br2
-9.3475157765068063E+019 BrSALA

The concentrations of these species in that grid box seems normal before they getting into the integrator:
13196.212474068439 BrSALA
6762.2799453671641 Br2
17365924.016521949 HOBr

My GCHP stretched simulation (fullchem, v14.2.2, with debromination on) at C200 (SF2.0) encountered the similar KPP error, wherein the explosion happened to iodine species in grid box (19 16 7):
1.2255442983974835E+018 HOI
1.1386758559108652E+021 I
-4.8607138921225430E+021 IO

Before entering the integrator, the iodine species concentrations also seemed normal:
384693.52015368728 HOI
176312.87417442043 I
225570.16518929612 IO

I wonder if you could provide any suggestions on solving this problem? Also, how do I convert the grid index (e.g. here the problem box in the C48 simulation, 4, 7, 16) in the GCHP into latitude and longitude? Thank you!

Please provide as much detail as possible. Always include the GCHP version number and any relevant configuration and log files.

@lizziel
Copy link
Contributor

lizziel commented Jan 26, 2024

Hi @hazel008, you may be encountering this known issue in 14.2.0: geoschem/geos-chem#1982.
The fix is in geoschem/geos-chem#2006 which is included in version 14.3.0. We are currently benchmarking 14.3.0 but you can download it by checking out the dev/14.3.0 branch at the top-level of the GCHP source code directory (git fetch; git checkout dev/14.3.0) and then running git submodule update --init --recursive.

@lizziel lizziel self-assigned this Jan 26, 2024
@hazel008
Copy link
Author

hazel008 commented Jan 27, 2024 via email

@lizziel lizziel closed this as completed Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants