[Backport 2023.01.xx] #8167 add serverType option to wms & csw catalog entries (#9048) #9063
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This Backport includes the commit f66f6d1 from the PR #9055
if undefined or set to "geoserver", the behaviour is unchanged. If set to "no-vendor", then TILED query parameter isnt sen't to the remote wms server, and the "tiled" and "localizedLayerStyles" options are hidden in the layer parameters.
more vendor options can be sent/avoided this way. Improves interoperability when displaying and printing layers coming from mapproxy.
closes #7809
closes #7877
closes #7879
Description
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
Issue
What is the current behavior?
#7809, #7877 & #7879
What is the new behavior?
can display and print layers coming from mapproxy, once "no-vendor" is set for the catalog entry.
Breaking change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
Other useful information
[interoperability] add flag to source when we know it's provided by geoserver #8167 (comment) is .. strange.
4b09ed5 isnt included after discussion with @allyoucanmap - widget codepaths have to be revisited ?