Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GeoServerRESTReader.existsWmsstore(String,String) has wrong implementation #190

Open
bilzkat opened this issue Apr 27, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@bilzkat
Copy link

bilzkat commented Apr 27, 2016

Line 622 should call the other existsWmsstore() not existsCoveragestore()

Current code:
public boolean existsWmsstore(String workspace, String wsName){
return existsCoveragestore(workspace, wsName, Util.DEFAULT_QUIET_ON_NOT_FOUND);
}

Update:
public boolean existsWmsstore(String workspace, String wsName){
return existsWmsstore(workspace, wsName, Util.DEFAULT_QUIET_ON_NOT_FOUND);
}

@simboss
Copy link
Member

simboss commented Apr 28, 2016

Would you mind providing a PR for this issue?

@simboss simboss added this to the 1.7.1 milestone Apr 28, 2016
bilzkat added a commit to bilzkat/geoserver-manager that referenced this issue Apr 29, 2016
Resolved geosolutions-it#190

existsWmsstore was calling existsCoveragestore instead of overloaded existsWmsstore
basduineveld pushed a commit to PDOK/DEPRECATED_geoserver-manager that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2016
Resolved geosolutions-it#190

existsWmsstore was calling existsCoveragestore instead of overloaded existsWmsstore
basduineveld pushed a commit to PDOK/DEPRECATED_geoserver-manager that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2016
Resolved geosolutions-it#190

existsWmsstore was calling existsCoveragestore instead of overloaded existsWmsstore
basduineveld pushed a commit to PDOK/DEPRECATED_geoserver-manager that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2016
Resolved geosolutions-it#190

existsWmsstore was calling existsCoveragestore instead of overloaded existsWmsstore
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants