This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
Provide causing exception to BadFormDefinition when available #835
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lognaturel
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2019
ggalmazor
deleted the
issue_834_unmask_bad_form_definition_causing_exceptions
branch
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #834
Test this PR with this JAR file:
briefcase_i834.zip
What has been done to verify that this works as intended?
Run automated tests
Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?
Straightforward change to enhance error logging.
How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?
No behavior changes in this PR.
Does this change require updates to documentation? If so, please file an issue at https://github.com/opendatakit/docs/issues/new and include the link below.
Nope.