You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's usually tricky to combine GPL with other licenses in one project. In some cases, GPL might actually be governing the entire project's source distribution terms indirectly.
Is this intentional? If yes, I think it would make sense to prominently note this in the README.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nielsvd
changed the title
Some files are still under GPL + classpath exception
Some files licensed under GPL + classpath exception
Jun 3, 2020
nielsvd
changed the title
Some files licensed under GPL + classpath exception
Some files licensed under GPL3 + classpath exception
Jun 3, 2020
All stuff in archive is old stuff that is not compiled and not included in any library, as such I don't think its licence should interfere. It's just there for "reference" if one day I feel like fixing them.
Does it create any issue for you?
The stuff related to 'sim' is indeed a mistake and should be changed to BSD.
Some files in this repository are licensed under GPL3 + classpath exception, more specifically:
It's usually tricky to combine GPL with other licenses in one project. In some cases, GPL might actually be governing the entire project's source distribution terms indirectly.
Is this intentional? If yes, I think it would make sense to prominently note this in the README.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: