WebSocketMain not yet handling continuation frame #129

Open
ken107 opened this Issue Dec 18, 2012 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@ken107
Contributor

ken107 commented Dec 18, 2012

Hi

I'm testing on IE8 against Tomcat 7 running a simple websocket app. The connection is closed unexpectedly while receiving some data. In the log window it says "[WebSocket] Fail connection by client: code=1003 reason=Received continuation frame, which is not implemented."

I see in the flash code, we're not handling the OPCODE_CONTINUATION. Is there plan to implement this soon?

Thanks

@ken107 ken107 closed this Dec 18, 2012

@ken107 ken107 reopened this Dec 18, 2012

@gimite

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@gimite

gimite Dec 18, 2012

Owner

Yeah that's not implemented. Hopefully I will implement it in the future, but I'm happy to accept pull request if someone implement it.

Owner

gimite commented Dec 18, 2012

Yeah that's not implemented. Hopefully I will implement it in the future, but I'm happy to accept pull request if someone implement it.

@jamespeek

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@jamespeek

jamespeek Jun 18, 2013

Hi
What would be involved to add in this feature? We've got an app which is sending back reasonably large chunks of data which is facing this issue in IE9. We could either implementing paging of the data on the server side, but thought I'd ask how much effort you think would be required to add it to the flash fall back.
Thanks

Hi
What would be involved to add in this feature? We've got an app which is sending back reasonably large chunks of data which is facing this issue in IE9. We could either implementing paging of the data on the server side, but thought I'd ask how much effort you think would be required to add it to the flash fall back.
Thanks

@gimite

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@gimite

gimite Jun 22, 2013

Owner

I'm not sure when I have time to implement it. It would be nice if someone implement it and sent pull request.

Owner

gimite commented Jun 22, 2013

I'm not sure when I have time to implement it. It would be nice if someone implement it and sent pull request.

@reklis

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@reklis

reklis Jun 24, 2013

Is it an actionscript code change or a javascript code change? I don't think I have the proper tools to do an actionscript code change, but I could throw some javascript at you

reklis commented Jun 24, 2013

Is it an actionscript code change or a javascript code change? I don't think I have the proper tools to do an actionscript code change, but I could throw some javascript at you

@gimite

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@gimite

gimite Jun 24, 2013

Owner

It's ActionScript change. You just need a normal text editor and a free command line tool (Flex SDK) to code ActionScript.

Owner

gimite commented Jun 24, 2013

It's ActionScript change. You just need a normal text editor and a free command line tool (Flex SDK) to code ActionScript.

ken107 added a commit to ken107/web-socket-js that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2013

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment