-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 771
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
People shouldn't be able to start work on more than 3 issues at a time #478
Comments
I've been noticing the same pattern. @owocki Can we display a message if they tried to click start work on the 4th time that says : |
@vs77bb have you experienced this? |
Yes. Additional feedback from Phil last week on one of his bounties:
There is a part of me that remembers that in our 'future of work' example, a developer should be able to pick and choose the projects that are interesting to him and that might be a few at a time. Maybe we set the limit at 4 or 5 to be more conservative about rolling this into the platform? |
I don't think it'd need to sync on Github @PixelantDesign. If a user tried to click 'Start Work' on Gitcoin, but had three already open, an error message should come up on Gitcoin / Gitcoin Bot should never comment on Github saying that user 'Started Work'. |
I think it might be best to move forward on all three. |
Agree let move forward on all 3. We will need messaging on why a user is limited to 3 and what they can do if they want to work on something else. |
I started a PR for 2 of the 3 last night ( #663 and #463 ).. I will throw a bounty on the third. @PixelantDesign ill leave it to you to bring the copy for messaging, that work? |
Right now, there is a pattern of people being greedy with 'starting work' on many issues at a time, but not truly working on them. We could consider having an upper limit on the number of issues one can have actively claimed at one time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: