You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Everybody agreed in #71 and #99 that double tilde should be the recommended way to mark up stricken text ~~foo~~, although cmark-gfm still needs to support single tilde markers ~foo~ for legacy reasons. However, cmark-gfm also supports triple tildes and really any number of matching tildes ~~~foo~~~ and, what's worse, even any mismatching numbers of tildes before and after the stricken text ~~~foo~, ~foo~~~. I doubt this is necessary for much existing content. Therefore:
Require the same number of tildes on both sides.
Limit this number to 2, keeping legacy support for just 1.
This would solve the (admittedly rare) problem of fenced code blocks being not recognized. commonmark/commonmark-spec#537
~~~foo~~~should perhaps be a code block~~~
~~~bar~should definitely be a code block~~~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Everybody agreed in #71 and #99 that double tilde should be the recommended way to mark up stricken text
~~foo~~
, although cmark-gfm still needs to support single tilde markers~foo~
for legacy reasons. However, cmark-gfm also supports triple tildes and really any number of matching tildes~~~foo~~~
and, what's worse, even any mismatching numbers of tildes before and after the stricken text~~~foo~
,~foo~~~
. I doubt this is necessary for much existing content. Therefore:This would solve the (admittedly rare) problem of fenced code blocks being not recognized. commonmark/commonmark-spec#537
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: