Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat add data hotkey for #39

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Feat add data hotkey for #39

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

keithamus
Copy link
Member

This is useful for explictly binding hotkeys to a form field, overriding the check that stops key combos firing for form fields.

This provides a way to delegate shortcuts for elements that control the content of a form field (for example toolbar buttons).

keithamus and others added 3 commits March 18, 2021 11:50
Co-authored-by: Kristján Oddsson <koddsson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kristján Oddsson <koddsson@gmail.com>
This is useful for _explictly_ binding hotkeys to a form field,
overriding the check that stops key combos firing for form fields.

This provides a way to delegate shortcuts for elements that control the
content of a form field (for example toolbar buttons).

Co-authored-by: Kristján Oddsson <koddsson@gmail.com>
@keithamus keithamus requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2021 12:36
@keithamus keithamus requested review from T-Hugs and srt32 March 18, 2021 12:36
Copy link
Contributor

@koddsson koddsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me!

@@ -22,24 +22,24 @@ export class Leaf<T> {
}
}

export class RadixTrie {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change makes the code a lot more readable and being able to subsequently remove the unknown types is great 🎉

@keithamus keithamus closed this Sep 30, 2021
@keithamus
Copy link
Member Author

We went with an alternate design in #49 and #51

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants