Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding tm_scope for REBOL language and removing REBOL from LICENSE_WHITE... #2257

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2015
Merged

Adding tm_scope for REBOL language and removing REBOL from LICENSE_WHITE... #2257

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2015

Conversation

Oldes
Copy link
Contributor

@Oldes Oldes commented Mar 23, 2015

...LIST as now is license available in the Sublime-REBOL project.

…ITELIST as now is license available in the Sublime-REBOL project.
@Oldes Oldes mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2015
@pchaigno
Copy link
Contributor

Could you update it in this pull request?

@Oldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oldes commented Mar 23, 2015

What do you mean with the: "Could you update it in this pull request?" ?

@pchaigno
Copy link
Contributor

I mean could you update the submodule for the Rebol grammar?
Otherwise, it should be updated with the next release :-)

@arfon
Copy link
Contributor

arfon commented Mar 23, 2015

👍 thanks @Oldes.

arfon added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2015
Adding tm_scope for REBOL language and removing REBOL from LICENSE_WHITE...
@arfon arfon merged commit 27215f1 into github-linguist:master Mar 23, 2015
@aroben
Copy link
Contributor

aroben commented Mar 23, 2015

Thank you!

@Oldes Oldes deleted the rebol_grammar_scope branch March 24, 2015 08:43
@arfon arfon mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2015
@github-linguist github-linguist locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants