-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CLI issues #4
Comments
Right, that make sense. Though for the moment, please, keep |
Is there a point in keeping |
Require
I never saw people use some particular term for this matrix. The term "the matrix
I would prefer to stick to the current workflow with separate command for every (of three) operation that should be fine. This is supposed to be a research tool, so that users also could play with it by changing/tuning some options and parameters; let us ommit one-button-press-solves-everything approach.
It is simple and I like it, so please leave it as it is now. Instead, please, dedicate your time and effort to solve real problems and not to rewrite existing packages. |
OK, let me put it another way: it is inconvenient for me to install |
Closing this due to 3f0677b. |
Here are some of the issues with
bin/delirium
tool:-m
and-t
options? Also, how do we call them
matrix in plain English?x
variable. We could use-x
option for this. As for theepsilon
variable, we could read in the input matrix, check that is has no more than two variables in it, and let the other variable (whatever it is) be the epsilon. We could additionally use an explicit-e
option for this, although I don't see the need.docopt-dispatch
, which is not a part of Sage distribution. We've already droppedpytest
for this reason; we'll need to do the same fordocopt-dispatch
.reduce
andnormalize
keywords into--reduce
and--normalize
.Oleksandr, if you're OK with these changes, I can implement them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: