packaging: overhaul glusterfs.spec(.in) to align with SUSE and Debian/Ubuntu packaging #1126
Comments
kalebskeithley
changed the title
|
A patch https://review.gluster.org/24248 has been posted that references this issue. packaging: refactor to align with best practices Fixes: #1126 Change-Id: I7748c7531d52dedd71b3a7f5df049742258a6aba |
|
A patch https://review.gluster.org/24248 has been posted that references this issue. packaging: refactor to align with best practices Fixes: #1126 Change-Id: I7748c7531d52dedd71b3a7f5df049742258a6aba |
|
A patch https://review.gluster.org/24563 has been posted that references this issue. packaging: refactor to align with common practices Apparently some sdditional Obsoletes: are required Change-Id: I919ae5a0fcc6f720e3eab4784af36977b9eef044 |
|
A patch https://review.gluster.org/24583 has been posted that references this issue. packaging: refactor to align with common practices The claim that Fedora package guidelines do not require this Change-Id: I7748c7531d52dedd71b3a7f5df049742258a6aba |
|
A patch https://review.gluster.org/24584 has been posted that references this issue. packaging: refactor to align with common practices Apparently some sdditional Obsoletes: are required Change-Id: I919ae5a0fcc6f720e3eab4784af36977b9eef044 |
The claim that Fedora package guidelines do not require this scheme is a non-argument. Not only do they not require it, they don't prohibit it either. (And you can't prove a negative. It's a specious argument.) Change-Id: I7748c7531d52dedd71b3a7f5df049742258a6aba Fixes: #1126 Signed-off-by: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Apparently some sdditional Obsoletes: are required Change-Id: I919ae5a0fcc6f720e3eab4784af36977b9eef044 Fixes: #1126 Signed-off-by: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
|
Thank you for your contributions. |
|
Closing this issue as there was no update since my last update on issue. If this is an issue which is still valid, feel free to open it. |
**Description of problem: **
Adopt common scheme for subpackages and their contents, e.g. each library is in its own subpackage, e.g. libglusterfs0...rpm, libgfapi0...rpm, libgfchangelog0...rpm, libgfxdr0....rpm. (corresponding -devel packages are libglusterfs-devel...rpm, etc.) FWIW, Ceph also follows this model in Fedora and RHEL, e.g. There might be other packages that follow this model in Fedora and RHEL too.
See https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-suse/blob/leap15-glusterfs-7/glusterfs.spec for an example of what this would look like.
I would suggest preserving the python3-gluster, -client, and other sub-packages for finer grain installation, unlike, e.g. the SUSE example which does not have -client or python3-gluster subpackages.
For glusterfs-8!
The exact command to reproduce the issue:
The full output of the command that failed:
Expected results:
Additional info:
** - The output of the
gluster volume infocommand**:** - The operating system / glusterfs version**:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: