-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CSUB-264: Minor follow up #826
Conversation
e528e92
to
ea0ec30
Compare
For full LLVM coverage report click here! |
ea0ec30
to
93c1bc6
Compare
93c1bc6
to
f19d84a
Compare
f19d84a
to
9fe2c6f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still wonder if there's a better way to ensure the upgrade hooks are implemented (and correctly), but since the shell script is in direct response to a prior issue I don't think it's worth holding this up.
LGTM
9fe2c6f
to
7d4ae09
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #826 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.24% 78.11% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 68 68
Lines 10726 10768 +42
==========================================
+ Hits 8393 8411 +18
- Misses 2333 2357 +24
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
for use with try-runtime and upgrades testing
which will satisfy check-storage-version-assert-in-migrations.sh
these are no longer Substrate hooks but rather a place where we can perform more assertions while testing migrations in CI. scripts/check-storage-version-assert-in-migrations.sh now becomes useless.
makes the code more concise and easier to read and removes the explicit checks for version number before applying the next migration!
d40a256
to
ffee704
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This updated implementation seems like a big improvement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if my review is valid but here you go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bunch of nitpicks but nothing big or blocking
dcc774e
8b746d3
to
dcc774e
Compare
Description of proposed changes:
Practical tips for PR review & merge: