You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Storing a zero as an int uses less memory compared to storing it as a str. This is because the string object has additional overhead for managing character data and string-specific metadata. Therefore, if memory efficiency is a concern, it is generally better to store numeric values as integers rather than strings.
The str approach to bits will be reserved for output purposes in the demonstrator alone. It doesn't change the fact, that wherever possible we still prefer dicts to lists, for better quality with multiple callable elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Storing a zero as an int uses less memory compared to storing it as a str. This is because the string object has additional overhead for managing character data and string-specific metadata. Therefore, if memory efficiency is a concern, it is generally better to store numeric values as integers rather than strings.
The str approach to bits will be reserved for output purposes in the demonstrator alone. It doesn't change the fact, that wherever possible we still prefer dicts to lists, for better quality with multiple callable elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: