Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for provider: Knot (self-hosted) #1721

Closed
5 tasks done
McSinyx opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

Support for provider: Knot (self-hosted) #1721

McSinyx opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@McSinyx
Copy link

McSinyx commented Sep 21, 2022

Welcome

  • Yes, I've searched similar issues on GitHub and didn't find any.
  • Yes, the DNS provider exposes a public API.
  • Yes, I know that the lego maintainers don't have an account in all DNS providers in the world.
  • Yes, I'm able to create a pull request and be able to maintain the implementation.
  • Yes, I'm able to test an implementation if someone creates a pull request to add the support of this DNS provider.

How do you use lego?

Other

Link to the DNS provider

https://www.knot-dns.cz

Link to the API documentation

https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/latest/html/man_knsupdate.html

Additional Notes

I use NixOS security.acme.certs for automated renewal.

Support for Knot has been implemented for acme.sh. I may be able to implement it for Lego with some guidance.

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Sep 21, 2022

Hello,

to create an implementation you can follow this implementation: https://github.com/go-acme/lego/tree/master/providers/dns/njalla

You can ask me questions if you need.

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jan 19, 2023

@McSinyx any news?

@Saklad5
Copy link

Saklad5 commented Feb 5, 2023

Why not use RFC 2136? That's what I use.


I would appreciate the ability to use Unix domain sockets with RFC 2136, which Knot DNS added support for in 3.2.5.

@McSinyx
Copy link
Author

McSinyx commented Feb 5, 2023 via email

@Saklad5
Copy link

Saklad5 commented Feb 5, 2023

I've opened a distinct issue for the UDS request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants