Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Webhooks implementation #2418

Closed
5 of 6 tasks
lunny opened this issue Aug 29, 2017 · 14 comments
Closed
5 of 6 tasks

Webhooks implementation #2418

lunny opened this issue Aug 29, 2017 · 14 comments
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Milestone

Comments

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Aug 29, 2017

This is a summary issue for all the requirement related with webhooks

@lunny lunny added type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. labels Aug 29, 2017
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.x.x milestone Aug 29, 2017
@lunny lunny mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2017
20 tasks
@lcges
Copy link

lcges commented Aug 31, 2017

@lunny How is progress on this task?

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Sep 1, 2017

@qdbdbp I have updated the issue content. Did this answered your question?

@lcges
Copy link

lcges commented Sep 1, 2017

ok.
Do you think all webhooks are coming in to release 1.3?

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Sep 1, 2017

I wish that.

@daviian
Copy link
Member

daviian commented Sep 21, 2017

@lunny PUSH event hooks not sent for branch removal Issue #2105 is done

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Sep 22, 2017

@daviian done.

@hellasteph
Copy link

Does this issue accept bounty? I would like to support for someone to complete this. ;)

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Oct 21, 2017

@hellasteph This is a summary issue, so I think no one people will work on all these issues. It's not suitable for bounty I think.

@hellasteph
Copy link

Thanks for clarification, @lunny. I’ll read through your summary and find the issue that best fits what I was hoping to have happen. Thank you!

@Ceda-EI
Copy link

Ceda-EI commented Mar 21, 2018

The PR (#908) regarding Issue webhooks has been closed. What is the status on that now?

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Mar 21, 2018

@thehowl

@thehowl
Copy link
Contributor

thehowl commented Mar 21, 2018

Needs to be re-made on the current codebase (& reviewed and merged). It's sort of dangling in my head, I may get around to it eventually, but the code is roughly the one of my PR, although it definitely needs to be changed to suit the way webhook code is currently written.

@lunny lunny mentioned this issue May 21, 2018
7 tasks
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented May 21, 2018

image

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Jun 5, 2018

Only #2219 left on this issue and I removed it since it's not a blocking issue.

@lunny lunny modified the milestones: 1.x.x, 1.5.0 Jun 5, 2018
@lunny lunny closed this as completed Jun 5, 2018
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants