Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enhancements of webhooks #3998

Open
5 of 7 tasks
lunny opened this issue May 21, 2018 · 7 comments
Open
5 of 7 tasks

Enhancements of webhooks #3998

lunny opened this issue May 21, 2018 · 7 comments
Labels
issue/confirmed Issue has been reviewed and confirmed to be present or accepted to be implemented type/summary This issue aggregates a bunch of other issues

Comments

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented May 21, 2018 •
edited
Loading

@lunny lunny added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label May 21, 2018
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.x.x milestone May 21, 2018
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented May 21, 2018

This is an enhancement of #2418

@noplanman
Copy link

Would be great if it were possible to resend a webhook payload.
It sometimes happens that a webhook call times out, so just being able to kick it again would be super helpful.

Is there a way to do this as it is now?

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Aug 1, 2018

@noplanman I think there is not. You can fire another issue and I can reference that issue here since this is only a summary issue.

@noplanman
Copy link

@lunny Will do, thanks!

@noplanman noplanman mentioned this issue Aug 1, 2018
Closed
3 tasks
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 16, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs during the next 2 weeks. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale label Jan 16, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 19, 2019

This issue has been automatically closed because of inactivity. You can re-open it if needed.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Feb 19, 2019
@lunny lunny added issue/confirmed Issue has been reviewed and confirmed to be present or accepted to be implemented and removed issue/stale labels Feb 19, 2019
@lunny lunny reopened this Feb 19, 2019
@WGH- WGH- mentioned this issue Aug 8, 2019
Merged
WGH- added a commit to WGH-/gitea that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
@WGH-
Implement webhook branch filter
7cd5748 
See go-gitea#2025, go-gitea#3998.
WGH- added a commit to WGH-/gitea that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2019
@WGH-
Implement webhook branch filter
2d824ab 
See go-gitea#2025, go-gitea#3998.
lafriks pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2019
@WGH- @lafriks
Implement webhook branch filter (#7791)
6ddd3b0 
* Fix validate() function to handle errors in embedded anon structs

* Implement webhook branch filter

See #2025, #3998.
@lunny lunny added type/summary This issue aggregates a bunch of other issues and removed type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality labels Oct 23, 2020
@lunny lunny removed this from the 1.x.x milestone Oct 23, 2020
@lhemala lhemala mentioned this issue Nov 20, 2020
Closed
@jolheiser jolheiser mentioned this issue Jan 18, 2021
Closed
@SystemZ SystemZ mentioned this issue Aug 3, 2022
Open
@SystemZ
Copy link

SystemZ commented Aug 3, 2022

Probably related as docs are not complete regarding webhooks: #9485

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
issue/confirmed Issue has been reviewed and confirmed to be present or accepted to be implemented type/summary This issue aggregates a bunch of other issues
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@lunny @SystemZ @noplanman