A miriad of Classes/Functions does not have the platform scope documented. (Specially HTML5)

[PeterMarques]

Tested versions

3.x (and certanly 4.x?)

System information

.

Issue description

As said in title, several classes that one may ponder if they work or not, is not clearly documented if they do.

I am at this moment bruteforcing a list of classes i need on web, to check if they are available.

As a first example, "IP", does not. but there is no place in the docs that it says so.

This is most certanly a problem in the HTML export, but android and ios may be affected as well, i supose.

Having a unified clear section in the documentation of each class, that declares all the platforms this class does not behave as expected/is not implemented, is needed.

This is already done in some classes, and some methods, indeed.

What i propose is a refactor of the documentation to clearly include the lacking/unbehaviour in implementation of each class, in a concise way.

The way it is done now, is on a case by case basis, and not fully covered.

Having this is both a incentive, if a non-implemented feature can be implemented (like webcam, only implemented on Apple), and a clear delimitation to platform specifc development(Like OS.execute(), that because of sandboxing will never be available on WEB, that is too, not documented as unavailable, even if obvious.)

Steps to reproduce

check documentation

Minimal reproduction project (MRP)

none

[AThousandShips]

Feature proposals are tracked here, this is for bugs. Please open a proposal instead.