You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would expect --sign and --sender to be specified at the same scope because they are closely related.
There's no coherent logic to which options must come before the subcommand and which options must come after the subcommand. I'd prefer to get rid of the order restrictions entirely and allow any option to appear anywhere. Failing that, all options should at least always be allowed after the subcommand (I believe that clap uses the attribute from_global to specify this behavior).
Several options, (-k, -S, -i) are used by multiple subcommands. I'd like to hoist them to have a common definition.
Instead of -i, I think it would be more intuitive to use -f/--force (which is the standard for overriding "helpful" restrictions) combined with either no -k or -k "" (an empty key)
upload-tree doesn't need to be a separate command. It can be upload -r, upload --recursive, or just assumed to be recursive if the source is a directory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
--sign
and--sender
to be specified at the same scope because they are closely related.from_global
to specify this behavior).-k
,-S
,-i
) are used by multiple subcommands. I'd like to hoist them to have a common definition.-i
, I think it would be more intuitive to use-f
/--force
(which is the standard for overriding "helpful" restrictions) combined with either no-k
or-k ""
(an empty key)upload-tree
doesn't need to be a separate command. It can beupload -r
,upload --recursive
, or just assumed to be recursive if the source is a directory.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: