Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Target the JVM #34

Closed
gopherbot opened this issue Nov 11, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

Target the JVM #34

gopherbot opened this issue Nov 11, 2009 · 4 comments

Comments

@gopherbot
Copy link

by tgdavies:

This would allow Go to leverage many third party libraries and environments (e.g. GAE)
and the JVMs 
GC and JIT capabilities.
@gopherbot
Copy link
Author

Comment 1 by dailey.don:

Go seems like a serious effort to get away from the VM and JVM cliche that has
infected new programming languages for many years.    
But Go is poised to fill a niche that has remained mostly untouched, finally a modern
compiled system language.   If you want to UN-distinguish the language, then JVM is a
good way.

@agl
Copy link
Contributor

agl commented Nov 11, 2009

Comment 2:

Status changed to Invalid.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Author

Comment 3 by HLKlaperman:

If anyone's interested, I've been working on a Go compiler that targets the JVM.  The
compiler itself is implemented in Scala, and the project is hosted on Google Code: 
code.google.com/p/jgo/

@gopherbot
Copy link
Author

Comment 4 by dailey.don:

Despite my previous comment, this sounds interesting.   I will take a look when I get a
chance.  Go is still a system language, this would just be another alternative.

nigeltao added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2015
…, since IE8 and

««« backport a70135896879
html, exp/html: escape ' and " as ' and ", since IE8 and
below do not support '.

This makes package html consistent with package text/template's
HTMLEscape function.

Fixes #3489.

R=rsc, mikesamuel, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5992071
»»»
@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants