You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We often run all benchmarks of std packages with -count=5 or higher, it usually takes 5-6 hours to finish on our x86 and arm64 servers, the overall turnaround time might be reduced a lot if we can skip the auto adjustment from round #2 and reuse the iteration number computed before.
With an experimental change I got the following numbers:
old new
package math/big 2865.780s 2242.640s
package runtime 5936.460s 4926.073s
package encodng/json 486.691s 321.370s
I realized same attempt was made before but then dropped due to benchmark regressions reported in #25622, a change to computing the 'grain' value of RunParallel proposed in #37996 shall avoid the regression. Furthermore this feature could be guarded by an option if necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We often run all benchmarks of std packages with -count=5 or higher, it usually takes 5-6 hours to finish on our x86 and arm64 servers, the overall turnaround time might be reduced a lot if we can skip the auto adjustment from round #2 and reuse the iteration number computed before.
With an experimental change I got the following numbers:
I realized same attempt was made before but then dropped due to benchmark regressions reported in #25622, a change to computing the 'grain' value of RunParallel proposed in #37996 shall avoid the regression. Furthermore this feature could be guarded by an option if necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: