You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
contracts
modernize contract’s language style
replace “always ticking” timelock with “withdrawal delay” mechanism
limit oracle’s power to amounts declared by parties
consider createChannel to be dependent on arguments
and not on hidden variable id; one channel per (owner, receiver) pair
rework GNTW to be ERC223 compliant
and merge channel creation with channel funding in single transaction
reconsider names of some of events
golem node id registration in the deposit
create a script that deploys contracts on Rinkeby
create and deploy a faucet contract
should it do the crowdfunding?
on deposits security
timeout nie jest konieczny bo oracle nie widzi wszystkich spraw
counter-argument: other guys can attempt to reuse those to replay
jezeli “dochody” oracla sa w cold wallet, to nie mozna zarobic hackując oracla
jeżeli poszkodowany nie może zarobić na byciu poszkodowanym, to niema powodu atakować oracla
palenie części tokenów winnego jest lepsze od redystrybucji tych tokenów ponieważ
powoduje to że bycie ofiarą nie jest dochodowe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Clean this up:
contracts
modernize contract’s language style
replace “always ticking” timelock with “withdrawal delay” mechanism
limit oracle’s power to amounts declared by parties
consider createChannel to be dependent on arguments
and not on hidden variable id; one channel per (owner, receiver) pair
rework GNTW to be ERC223 compliant
and merge channel creation with channel funding in single transaction
reconsider names of some of events
golem node id registration in the deposit
create a script that deploys contracts on Rinkeby
create and deploy a faucet contract
should it do the crowdfunding?
on deposits security
timeout nie jest konieczny bo oracle nie widzi wszystkich spraw
counter-argument: other guys can attempt to reuse those to replay
jezeli “dochody” oracla sa w cold wallet, to nie mozna zarobic hackując oracla
jeżeli poszkodowany nie może zarobić na byciu poszkodowanym, to niema powodu atakować oracla
palenie części tokenów winnego jest lepsze od redystrybucji tych tokenów ponieważ
powoduje to że bycie ofiarą nie jest dochodowe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: