Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework sync API to be separate from data access API #482

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 2, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jingtang10
Copy link
Collaborator

@jingtang10 jingtang10 commented May 18, 2021

IMPORTANT: All PRs must be linked to an issue (except for extremely trivial and straightforward changes).

Fixes #[issue number]

Description
Clear and concise code change description.

Alternative(s) considered
Have you considered any alternatives? And if so, why have you chosen the approach in this PR?

Type
Choose one: (Bug fix | Feature | Documentation | Testing | Code health | Builds | Releases | Other)

Screenshots (if applicable)

Checklist

  • I have read and acknowledged the Code of conduct
  • I have read How to Contribute
  • I have read the Developer's guide
  • I have signed the Google Individual CLA, or I am covered by my company's Corporate CLA
  • I have discussed my proposed solution with code owners in the linked issue(s) and we have agreed upon the general approach
  • I have run ./gradlew spotlessApply and ./gradlew spotlessCheck to check my code follows the style guide of this project
  • I have run ./gradlew check and ./gradlew connectedCheck to test my changes locally
  • I have built and run the reference app(s) to verify my change fixes the issue and/or does not break the reference app(s)


fun updatePeriodicSyncConfiguration(syncConfig: PeriodicSyncConfiguration)
suspend fun syncUpload(upload: (suspend (List<SquashedLocalChange>) -> List<LocalChangeToken>))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we're leaking DB abstraction here. We'll have to think of a way to do decouple keeping the abstractions.

@jingtang10 jingtang10 changed the title WIP rework sync API Rework sync API to be separate from data access API May 19, 2021
@jingtang10 jingtang10 marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2021 16:46
Copy link
Contributor

@yigit yigit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry i miseed it in the first CL but can you add more tests here. this part is fairly tricky so would be good to test well.

* true if the SDK needs to retry a failed sync attempt, false otherwise If this is set to true,
* then the result of the sync will be reported after the retry.
*/
val retry: Boolean = false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where is this used?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jingtang10 jingtang10 requested a review from yigit May 27, 2021 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants