You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bit newer to the package (and just recently returning to R) so good chance this question has an easy answer that I haven't come across yet. I was curious on the rationale behind setting explicit parameters for expected.model.size, expected.r2, and prior.df in the bsts.model.size and not enabling any means of optionally setting. I'd imagine that the appropriate number of covariates would vary significantly depending on the type of data, so surprised me that this was an unadjustable static value.
Obviously can go through the trouble of building a bsts model separately (and maybe that's more common than I'm realizing) but would be great to know if there's a reason behind the assumptions before trudging off to do that. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bit newer to the package (and just recently returning to R) so good chance this question has an easy answer that I haven't come across yet. I was curious on the rationale behind setting explicit parameters for
expected.model.size
,expected.r2
, andprior.df
in the bsts.model.size and not enabling any means of optionally setting. I'd imagine that the appropriate number of covariates would vary significantly depending on the type of data, so surprised me that this was an unadjustable static value.Obviously can go through the trouble of building a bsts model separately (and maybe that's more common than I'm realizing) but would be great to know if there's a reason behind the assumptions before trudging off to do that. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: