Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rationale for explicit bsts parameters in CausalImpact::ConstructModel for StaticRegression #71

Open
bsaunders27 opened this issue Jan 31, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@bsaunders27
Copy link

Bit newer to the package (and just recently returning to R) so good chance this question has an easy answer that I haven't come across yet. I was curious on the rationale behind setting explicit parameters for expected.model.size, expected.r2, and prior.df in the bsts.model.size and not enabling any means of optionally setting. I'd imagine that the appropriate number of covariates would vary significantly depending on the type of data, so surprised me that this was an unadjustable static value.

Obviously can go through the trouble of building a bsts model separately (and maybe that's more common than I'm realizing) but would be great to know if there's a reason behind the assumptions before trudging off to do that. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant